The Great American Stupid


It’s well and truly upon us, is The Great American Stupid. Oh, it’s been around for quite some time, and it afflicted mostly the political Left in America, but there were many on the Right who fell prey to the mindworm also.

I’m making this point seriously. There’s no intent whatsoever to be hyperbolic here.

The Great American Stupid now so completely owns the Left and their political wing, the Democrat Party, that if some magical thing were to happen and every person were prevented from saying or writing or broadcasting anything stupid, then Democrats in elective office all across the land would immediately fall utterly silent.

  • Professors would enter their classrooms and find themselves unable to say a single word.
  • So would an embarrassing number of kindergarten, elementary and high school teachers.
  • CNN anchors would come on the air, and utter not a sound.
  • The “nightly news” would fall silent, except for, you know, news. (if any of them can even recognize that anymore)
  • MSNBC’s roster of pundits would be as mute as if each had completely lost his or her larynx.
  • Newspapers across the land would lose 95-98% of their content.
  • Radio shows everywhere would leave their audiences wondering whether the station had gone off the air.
  • Nearly all current sources of “information” about COVID would disappear instantly.
  • Since Social media discriminates heavily in favor of The Stupid, contributions to Social Media outlets would drop dramatically.
  • Media outlets of all types across the nation would fall eerily silent.
  • In one of the greatest acts of public service ever, NPR would be completely silent.

Many, many Republicans, too, would experience a dramatic reduction in their ability to say anything, but they’d at least be able to say some things.

It’s not that Democrats don’t have anything intelligent to say, they just never say it! They simply parrot nitwittery, after buffoonery, after halfwittery, after inanity, after moronia, then follow that with whatever tantrum is most in vogue at the time, or most fits the context. They haven’t said anything intelligent in so long that they’ve lost the ability to do it.

Through grandstanding, virtue signalling, posing, hamming it up, faking it, lying, parroting, whining, fabricating, and lying some more, they’ve entirely lost the ability to recognize any intelligence they might once have had, and thus can’t express it.

Nowadays, in the face of even the most milquetoasty of pushback on any topic, the immediate response of Democrats, and the Left in general, is to scream insults and to shut down any hope for debate by bludgeoning everyone into silence.

Still, no one states the obvious conclusion that everyone should draw from this: The Left recognizes — loudly, publicly and ostentatiously — that they can’t win a real debate on any important issue. So they simply dispatch whatever goons they’ve got hanging around to prevent the debate entirely.

Surely everyone’s also noticed that all goons are leftists, yes?

There are points — legitimate points — to make that run counter to Conservative ideas. Conservative thinking, though, is apparently so far beyond the ken of your average Democrat politician, and many of their voters, that they don’t even bother to try to engage with it.

Finally: Joe Biden is stupid. He’s an idiot. He’s been an idiot for decades. His current dementia hasn’t made any improvements to him.

Biden’s Vice-President is an idiot too. It is not “playing fair” to avoid pointing that out: loudly, positively, savagely, often… and every time these two victims of The Great American Stupid make it plain what idiots they are. It’s not “playing fair,” it’s chickening out from doing our sacred duty to protect our country from idiots like these.

There are people who had no qualms whatsoever about saying all that loudly and often and from the rafters about former President Donald Trump.

Well, as some of us who also didn’t like Trump, but recognized that he was a whole lot better than Biden (but so’s a kumquat) pointed out; it’s time for them, and all the Never Trumpers to join in on stating the obvious: Every prominent elected Democrat in America today is an idiot. A crazy, power-mad, hateful, IQ-deprived, brainless would-be mini-tyrant, entirely consumed by The Great American Stupid.

Now, imagine what would happen if that same magical phenomenon, mentioned above, were to happen again, but this time preventing anyone from doing anything stupid…

— xPraetorius

83 thoughts on “The Great American Stupid

  1. Phew! I am so glad there is someone out there, like yourself, who can judge the stupid in another, according to your own personal biases. What a relief! Don’t stop. Please continue.

  2. Well, well, well. I see nothing’s really changed since I left. Still championing against the “evil left” I see.

    You know, I honestly thought that four years of Donald Trump in office would make you, at least, observe the direction that the right is taking. I believed that you would be disappointed how far gone your side has gone to the point where conspiracy theories and political violence have become almost normalized.

    But I was wrong. Dead wrong. Instead, you’ve continued your unabated attack on anything left wing while saying little or nothing about the right. I would’ve taken you seriously if you’ve produced sound criticism about the left as well as the right. But as usual, you’ve demonstrated that’s not have you operate. As shown in this post alone, your version of criticism is to call something stupid at least once.

    You know, I recently had a debate and conversation with a conservative. I disagreed with her points while she disagreed with mine. But it was still a civil interaction. We respected each other’s differing views and agreed on some things. It was a far cry from all the *ahem* arguments I had with you while I was still blogging.

    I see Doug here knows how you are when it comes to opposing views. You even said it yourself in a previous post. And I see that if it was about winning arguments, an objective you’ve made clear numerous times – especially on this post, it’s as plain as day that he’s beaten you every time. Truth be told, he’s been more civil to you than you were to him, and that says a lot about you and others like you who claim to be conservatives.

    But it’s not just about conduct. It’s also about reality and truth which Doug has tried to explain to you about where the right is going. You’ve denied his observation and even insulted him. What happened on January 6th of this year was a stark and brutal display of the severe decline in American politics where white rage-filled grievance, entitlement and paranoia exploded outside and inside the Capitol building. It’s where Trump’s most devoted disciples, coaxed by Trump himself, committed acts of terrorism (especially murder) against this very government! And they were supported by certain Republican politicians sitting in office right now with no consequences facing them by Democratic politicians supposedly outraged over the insurrection.

    Those people wanted blood, because they were told that the election was rigged against their leader in favor of Joe Biden. They were angry that Trump wasn’t elected a second time. But instead of taking the loss, they ran towards excuses, anything to explain that reality was fixed. They can’t process the failure. They refused to accept it. They got angry and January 6th was the result. They’ll even blame Antifa or anything leftist or anything they deem as leftist. And to this day, many of them still won’t accept the results.

    And here you are, doing the same thing.

    I know you, xPraetorius. I know where this could go if you allow this message in your comment section. Soon, you’ll call this stupid. You’ll insult me and may even call me stupid. You’ll identify yourself as a black woman after that comment I made about white rage-filled grievance…to oddly and witlessly undermine that point. You’ll try to twist our past arguments in your favor. You’ll do this, that and the other, maintain your record of predictability, and ultimately write about anti-left post probably after you’ve made a post about how you somehow defeated me in an argument.

    Owning the left seems to be your only primary concern.

    Well, it’s your blog, and you can write whatever you want to your few readers. It just confirms me that so many of you are incredibly pathetic, and you’ve chosen to be on the wrong side of history, because your anger and fear takes precedence over reality and truth, two things you apparently have an inverse definition of. That’s why all your posts and responses sound like they were written by a spoiled child with a thesaurus having a temper tantrum over why the world isn’t made for people like him, or her, whatever gender you want to portray yourself as. Lol

    Doug, if you’re reading this, you probably know what kind of person you’re dealing with when you’re having a disagreement with him/her. You’re dealing with someone who considers Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro “brilliant”. That should raise a red flag or two.

    You see, xPraetorius, the reality when it comes to you is that you’re championing for the losing side that only has itself to blame for allowing internet trolls, conspiracy theories, far-right extremists and the usual run-of-the-mill hate groups and anti-social weirdos to gain prominence in the political arena to “own the libs”. Face it, your side is sick. You’re sick. And you all are getting sicker. (The proof is the overall consensus and response regarding to Covid-19) That’s the cold-hard truth and reality. Even though Republicans in many states are doing everything they can to manipulate voting rights that will likely disproportionately affect black communities, you’ll argue that it’s a leftist lie while believing in voter fraud against Donald Trump, a man who knowingly allowed the coronavirus to take hundreds of thousands of lives under his watch!

    You really don’t know how ridiculous you’re being. What are you really angry and afraid of? Neither of those – by the way – are emotions to be empowered or justified when you’re fighting an unjust and unsound cause no matter what a so-called “conservative”, Republican or what Trump says.

    Maybe one day, you’ll truly wake up, stop blaming all of your fears and rage on something else other than yourself, grow and become a true conservative and fight to save conservatism instead of knowingly poisoning it on your blog and in your mind and heart.

    Take care.

    1. Very well stated (even without your kind references to my replies). Sadly.. methinks your anticipation of “his” response is likely going to be accurate.

      1. Thanks.

        [Paragraph Deleted: Said many times before.]

        Like you and I said, the right, Republicans and conservatives; all of them are in a serious crisis, a crisis that’s been brewing for years, even before Trump came to power, in my opinion. Trump himself made things much worse for them and this country. But I haven’t seen anything xPraetorius said about the condition of the right or their decent into madness and self-poisoning that’s anywhere near as observant or as focused as his obsession with hating the left.

        [Paragraph Deleted: Repetition.]

        Okay?

        So xPraetorius, if you’re reading this, you should know that you should be held accountable for knowingly taking part in tanking political discussions and strengthening the division between the left and right. The left is not entirely to blame for this. It deserves some. But your brand of malice and overall sociopathy directed solely at the left has made the right, especially the evangelical right, as un-Christlike as humanly possible with zero sense of responsibility other than worshiping rich, straight white males with right wing extremist views.

        [Paragraph Deleted: Repetition.]

        [Paragraph Deleted: Repetition.]

        1. Lol! BW… why don’t you try this:
          Step 1: Assert a point.
          Step 2: Support the point.

          You cover the first part, and never do the second part. That’s why it’s worthless trying to interact with you. I do all the work.

          Now, let’s cover the parts of your post that are wrong, but that you haven’t (exactly) said before.

          You said:
          “Like you (Doug) and I said, the right, Republicans and conservatives; all of them are in a serious crisis, a crisis that’s been brewing for years, even before Trump came to power, in my opinion. Trump himself made things much worse for them and this country. But I haven’t seen anything xPraetorius said about the condition of the right or their decent into madness and self-poisoning that’s anywhere near as observant or as focused as his obsession with hating the left.”

          My Reply: Wrong. First the word is “descent.” I see you still haven’t learned to spell since you and I last interacted. Next: this sentence — “I haven’t seen anything xPraetorius said about the condition of the right or their decent into madness and self-poisoning that’s anywhere near as observant or as focused as his obsession with hating the left” — is incoherent. Why don’t you try it again.

          This might be why you’re latching onto Doug. He lacks intellectual coherence too.

          – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
          You said: “So xPraetorius, if you’re reading this, you should know that you should be held accountable for knowingly taking part in tanking political discussions and strengthening the division between the left and right. The left is not entirely to blame for this. It deserves some. But your brand of malice and overall sociopathy directed solely at the left has made the right, especially the evangelical right, as un-Christlike as humanly possible with zero sense of responsibility other than worshiping rich, straight white males with right wing extremist views.”

          My Reply: Oh? Specifically for what do I need to be “held accountable?” SPECIFICALLY. Don’t just say things. BACK THEM UP.

          Doofus.

          And: HOW will you “hold me accountable?” Since you worship rich straight black males with left wing extremist views, you have nothing to say in that regard.

          You’ve already confessed to being a racist; I unmasked you as a bigoted bastard, and you continue to confirm that characterization.

          Since you’re a black supremacist, you have nothing to say, really, about anything. You’re the kind of useful idiot that will sink this once great country. Congratulations. But, don’t worry… you’ll be on the right side of history!

          Bastard.

          Best,

          — x

          1. Still censoring repetitive points while allowing yourself that privilege. Like I said once, some of your posts are literally titled “It’s worth repeating”.

            I didn’t know I was dealing with an English teacher who needs to heed his own advice. I really don’t see how correcting my spelling is important to this discussion, but whatever.

            If you can’t understand what I’ve said, maybe, just maybe, it’s you who lack intellectual coherence.

            The usual condescension and name-calling. Both are usually signs that you have nothing to bring to the discussion. I also see signs of projection and insecurity, the hallmarks of you being…you. lol

            You can hate me all you want, but no matter what you say, the right is screwed up, enough to allow low-intelligent gun nuts like Lauren Boebert, raving conspiracy theorists like Marjorie Greene, do-nothing accomplices to sexual assault like Jim Jordan and possible pedophile like Matt Gaetz to be elected into office. It’s what got Donald Trump elected. It’s why his supporters want him to still be in office despite losing to Joe Biden, and of course, why so many angry white people stormed the Capitol on January 6th. And this is just for starters.

            Face it, you’re being used, because they know you have a weak-enough mind to believe anything anyone of the far-right says, and that you’re angry enough to avoid listening to reason as opposed to remaining in your extreme right wing echo chamber.

            I’ve seen it before with other angry so-called conservatives. Trust me, you’re no different.

            As a side note, that’s why I mentioned Jews, because the way things are going with you, you are heading down that world of white nationalism or worse.

            So, go ahead, get mad and say what you really want to say since you value freedom of speech.

          2. You said:
            Still censoring repetitive points while allowing yourself that privilege. Like I said once, some of your posts are literally titled “It’s worth repeating”.

            My reply:
            Obviously we censor nothing. If we allow something to appear numerous times, as we’ve done for you, then if we just stop it from appearing anymore — because it’s already appeared numerous times — that’s not censorship.

            You’ve already admitted that you planned to fill up our space with nonsense repeated over and over again, so as to conceal messages in the pile of dross. We just decided not to put up with that.

            Oh, and some things are just, you know… worth repeating.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            I didn’t know I was dealing with an English teacher who needs to heed his own advice. I really don’t see how correcting my spelling is important to this discussion, but whatever.

            My reply:
            I’m not an English teacher. I have taught French and Russian at the university level. I’ve also given private English lessons, but that would make me a tutor. Okay… I guess that’s a kind of a teacher. As to correcting your spelling, I DO expect a certain level of literacy from those who think they have something to say. You should expect it of yourself as well.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            If you can’t understand what I’ve said, maybe, just maybe, it’s you who lack intellectual coherence.

            My reply:
            Maybe. I doubt it, though. If you read our respective oeuvres, you’ll see that mine is more literate, more informed, more detailed, more buttressed by facts and observations. Yours will not fare well in a direct comparison.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            The usual condescension and name-calling. Both are usually signs that you have nothing to bring to the discussion. I also see signs of projection and insecurity, the hallmarks of you being…you. lol

            My reply:
            Thank you. Since you started the condescension and name-calling, you just indicted yourself and your own thinking. Well done, BW! Here’s how the sequence went:
            1: You started the name-calling and condescension.
            2: I (we) warned you to stop it — numerous times.
            3: I (we) refused to go down into the muck with you, but told you that if you didn’t stop, then we’d have no qualms about going low as you did.
            4: You didn’t stop.
            5: We joined you in the name-calling and condescension. We were a LOT better at it than you. Part of the problem was that our “name-calling” was… true. You ARE a bigoted bastard.
            6: Your tender feelings got hurt and you went away.
            7: Later on you came back and whined some more about name-calling.

            That pretty much brings us to the present day. And you’re still whining.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            You can hate me all you want, but no matter what you say, the right is screwed up, enough to allow low-intelligent gun nuts like Lauren Boebert, raving conspiracy theorists like Marjorie Greene, do-nothing accomplices to sexual assault like Jim Jordan and possible pedophile like Matt Gaetz to be elected into office. It’s what got Donald Trump elected. It’s why his supporters want him to still be in office despite losing to Joe Biden, and of course, why so many angry white people stormed the Capitol on January 6th. And this is just for starters.

            My reply:
            I hate no one. I DO feel sorry for you, since you’re just a leaf on the stream, with no thoughts of your own, except those that are given to you by your masters.

            Even stipulating what you say about Lauren Boebert, etc., there are 100 leftist total nutcases for every right-wing eccentric.

            I get a chuckle out of your assumption that the allegations brought up by the media — who have done nothing but lie, lie, lie and lie some more for the past few decades, are clearly true if they support your whacked-out narrative. As I mentioned, you have no thoughts of your own.

            You said: “why so many angry white people stormed the Capitol on January 6th.” — Yep: You are a bigioted bastard. If you were to look at that crowd, you’d have seen that there were many, many, many non-white people in the crowd.

            Finally, the sad truth has already come out. We don’t know who won the Presidential election of 2020. The Left saw to it that the Democrat would win, whether or not the Democrat won. It’s entirely possible that Trump lost to Biden. Not likely, but possible. It’s also entirely possible that Biden lost. The result was a foregone conclusion long before Election Day. Time Magazine exposed that truth for all to see.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            Face it, you’re being used, because they know you have a weak-enough mind to believe anything anyone of the far-right says, and that you’re angry enough to avoid listening to reason as opposed to remaining in your extreme right wing echo chamber.

            My reply:
            Face it, you’re being used, because they know you have a weak-enough mind to believe anything anyone of the far-left says, and that you’re angry enough to avoid listening to reason as opposed to remaining in your extreme left wing echo chamber.

            Someone with that problem would post exactly what you posted. Thanks for proving my suspicions.

            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            I’ve seen it before with other angry so-called conservatives. Trust me, you’re no different.

            My reply:
            Lol! Your ignorance has oozed over into the realm of the comic. YOU pretending to have some kind of insight into Conservatives! After you’ve already asserted — really vehemently! — that people can’t POSSIBLY understand other people who aren’t like them. Dude: you just can’t stop yourself from saying dumb things!
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            As a side note, that’s why I mentioned Jews, because the way things are going with you, you are heading down that world of white nationalism or worse.

            My reply:
            To an anti-semitic black nationalist, everyone who disagrees looks like a white nationalist. Obviously. Yawn. Imagine you, the admitted racist, the bigoted bastard, getting all indignant because you’ve deluded yourself into thinking someone else is doing the same thing.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            You said:
            So, go ahead, get mad and say what you really want to say since you value freedom of speech.

            My reply:
            I’m not mad at anyone. I pity you. You’re kind of pathetic.

            We DO value freedom of speech. We haven’t banned a single person from our blog. We haven’t censored a single thought on our blog. You did those things NUMEROUS times on YOUR blog.

            You’re also a crypto-fascist who believes in the on-line equivalent of book burning. Why don’t you just admit it: You’re a Nazi. It’s just not fashionable to say that, so you pretend to be anti-Nazi, when all your strongest instincts are to be a… Nazi.
            – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

            Best,

            — x

          3. Lol! But it’ll work.

            Plus, you have no idea of the exchange between BW and me over the past few years. My post was perfectly appropriate, given what he has posted many, many times in the past.

            Best,

            — x

    2. You said:
      Well, well, well. I see nothing’s really changed since I left. Still championing against the “evil left” I see.
      My reply:
      Well, I’d hope so! Since the Left IS evil, it’s the right thing to do to “champion” against it. Obviously. 🙂
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      You know, I honestly thought that four years of Donald Trump in office would make you, at least, observe the direction that the right is taking. I believed that you would be disappointed how far gone your side has gone to the point where conspiracy theories and political violence have become almost normalized.

      My reply:
      #1: You didn’t think that. #2: You obviously haven’t read what I’ve written about Donald Trump. #3: Since YOU have no idea what either the Left or Right is doing — like out poor, ignorant friend Doug — then you’re in no position to tell me what I do or don’t know about it. Especially since political violence has been “normal” on the Left for generations now, and the likes of YOU defend the bastards doing it. Finally, #4: you never “thought honestly” in the entire time you and I were exchanging points of view, and you obviously haven’t started now.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      But I was wrong. Dead wrong. Instead, you’ve continued your unabated attack on anything left wing while saying little or nothing about the right. I would’ve taken you seriously if you’ve produced sound criticism about the left as well as the right. But as usual, you’ve demonstrated that’s not have you operate. As shown in this post alone, your version of criticism is to call something stupid at least once.

      My reply:
      Well, you got one thing right. You were wrong.

      I don’t need or want you to take me seriously… because I don’t need or want the ignorant to take me seriously, so I don’t care whether you take me seriously or not. That’s why I asked both you and Doug to take a hike. You’re both ignorant, have nothing intelligent to say, and you both say it at great length.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      You know, I recently had a debate and conversation with a conservative. I disagreed with her points while she disagreed with mine. But it was still a civil interaction. We respected each other’s differing views and agreed on some things. It was a far cry from all the *ahem* arguments I had with you while I was still blogging.

      My reply:
      I know how that “debate” went already: You said something stupid and bigoted, because you’re a bigoted bastard, and a card-carrying, irrational member of the Race Grievance Industry, and she realized that she had to placate you, or else you’d go off on one of your usual snowflakey tirades and possibly get her fired from her job or the like. If she was a REAL Conservative, she didn’t “respect” your points of view, because your points of view are reprehensible and hateful. You’re a racist and a fascist-lite. What’s there to respect about that? What she DID respect (again, if she was a REAL Conservative) was the fact that you COULD have her fired, or run out of town, or ostracized, if she said anything that might offend your tender sensibilities.

      Your “argument” with the alleged Conservative was different from yours and mine, because I don’t coddle you, or pretend that I “respect” your ugly, racist, hateful, ignorant points of view. I used to do that, until I realized that you WANTED to be coddled, but that you NEEDED some truth… As America SHOULD have done with Hitler, with the Bolsheviks, with nitwits and half-wits like AOC today… and like you and Doug.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      I see Doug here knows how you are when it comes to opposing views. You even said it yourself in a previous post. And I see that if it was about winning arguments, an objective you’ve made clear numerous times – especially on this post, it’s as plain as day that he’s beaten you every time. Truth be told, he’s been more civil to you than you were to him, and that says a lot about you and others like you who claim to be conservatives.

      My reply:
      Doug’s an idiot. The 21st Century equivalent of Neville Chamberlain. People like him are too intransigently stupid to be worth the discussion. There are very real REASONS the Hitler’s, the Mao’s, the Stalin’s, the Castro’s, the Pol Pot’s of the world came to power, and it’s because of idiots like you and Doug.

      If you think “Doug’s beaten me every time,” then you plainly haven’t read our exchanges. He asserts and backs up nothing; then I prove him wrong and back it up. If you believe that’s my being “defeated,” then you merely confirm that you remain the idiot you were when last we “conversed.”

      Finally, as proof of that, you obviously didn’t read ALL of Doug’s and my exchanges, where I was VERY cordial and polite to him, until he lapsed into gratuitous insults. At that point, I warned him to cut it out. He didn’t, so I took off the gloves. I never start any acrimony, but if someone else is going to start it, as Doug and you did, then I have no qualms about joining in and trading verbal punch for verbal punch. Sissies like you and Doug generally can’t handle that kind of exchange, because they’re used to the other guy backing down when they launch one of their tantrums.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      But it’s not just about conduct. It’s also about reality and truth which Doug has tried to explain to you about where the right is going. You’ve denied his observation and even insulted him. What happened on January 6th of this year was a stark and brutal display of the severe decline in American politics where white rage-filled grievance, entitlement and paranoia exploded outside and inside the Capitol building. It’s where Trump’s most devoted disciples, coaxed by Trump himself, committed acts of terrorism (especially murder) against this very government! And they were supported by certain Republican politicians sitting in office right now with no consequences facing them by Democratic politicians supposedly outraged over the insurrection.

      My reply:
      This one from you is just funny. And idiotic. Now that the dust has settled, even the brainless goons in the dominant media have admitted that their reports were all fabrications. None of what you said happened ACTUALLY happened, and the only people who died were those who died either at the hands of the Capitol police or of natural causes — heart attacks and the like.

      Chew on this fact, BW: There were about 400 arrests that day, and no one — not a single, solitary person — has been charged with anything more serious than assault. No sedition. No insurrection. No murder. Nothing. Simple assault.

      Furthermore, the Biden Administration has admitted that EVERYTHING it said about January 6th was wrong.

      I see you remain aggressively ignorant. “Aggressively” because you CHOOSE not to do any research or thinking for yourself to check up on the “news” media, who have proven time and time and time and time and time and time again that they fabricate stuff out of thin air, and that they lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie again. And idiots like you and Doug believe them over and over and over and over and over again.

      You ARE the useful idiots who allow the Hitlers of the world to prosper and to seize power when they do. You’re the useful idiots who bear much of the responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of millions at the hands of the tyrants whose agendas you support either actively like you, or through sticking your heads in the sand like Doug.

      Finally: show me where Trump told anyone to do anything wrong on January 6th. One bit of evidence please. Just one. Glenn Greenwald — leftist extraordinaire has demonstrated that NONE of what idiots like you and Doug say is true. Want the link? Okay — here it is: https://greenwald.substack.com/p/as-the-insurrection-narrative-crumbles Want the headline? Sure thing! Here it is: “As the Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling to it More Desperately Than Ever” Want the sub-head? Sure thing! Here it is: “If the threat of “armed insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists” is as great as some claim, why do they have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it?”

      That last is a good question, BW. I could pose it to YOU. In fact, I will: If the threat of “armed insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists” is as great as YOU claim, why do YOU have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it? Hmmmm…? Well? Your answer?

      I won’t wait around. You don’t HAVE an answer. Because you’re a liar, an ignoramus and a bigoted bastard.

      Oh, and Gleen Greenwald is on YOUR side. He just happens to have some integrity and respect for ACTUALLY finding things out, and for ACTUALLY backing up what he believes with facts not fabrications. In other words, Glenn Greenwald is a leftist who, in due time, will become a Conservative. Like ANY critical thinker. It’s why you and Doug won’t ever be Conservatives… because you’re idiots who choose to remain idiots.

      At the beginning of our exchanges, despite your abusiveness, irrationality and racism, I kind of liked you, because I’d deluded myself about your character. I thought you were a nice guy, who was just misled, or misdirected, or who needed to open his eyes a bit. As time went on, though, I realized you were, and obviously remain, a hard-core racist, a genuine bigoted bastard. And you’re a bigoted bastard who’s willing to entertain fantasies about the violent deaths of billions of white people… as you have already done on your now-defunct blog. I immortalized your crazed fantasy here in these pages, though… so it’s there for you to catch back up on if you’d like.

      Doug didn’t “explain” anything to me or to anyone else. He parroted fabrications from the “news” media as if they were accepted facts, and figured he’s made his point. Well, ANYONE can swallow uncritically and then repeat the lies of someone who lies confidently and forthrightly, as the “news” media do… and that’s all that Doug has ever done. I then demolished all that nonsense and Doug slunk off, tail between legs.

      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Those people wanted blood, because they were told that the election was rigged against their leader in favor of Joe Biden. They were angry that Trump wasn’t elected a second time. But instead of taking the loss, they ran towards excuses, anything to explain that reality was fixed. They can’t process the failure. They refused to accept it. They got angry and January 6th was the result. They’ll even blame Antifa or anything leftist or anything they deem as leftist. And to this day, many of them still won’t accept the results.

      My reply:
      If you were to read Glenn Greenwald’s expose about January 6, you’d see that all that you said above is false. I don’t expect you to read it, though, so that’s that. 🙂
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      And here you are, doing the same thing.

      My reply:
      Yep. It’s a noble cause, and someone has to do it! And, thank goodness, there are more and more and more and more like us every day.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      I know you, xPraetorius. I know where this could go if you allow this message in your comment section. Soon, you’ll call this stupid. You’ll insult me and may even call me stupid. You’ll identify yourself as a black woman after that comment I made about white rage-filled grievance…to oddly and witlessly undermine that point. You’ll try to twist our past arguments in your favor. You’ll do this, that and the other, maintain your record of predictability, and ultimately write about anti-left post probably after you’ve made a post about how you somehow defeated me in an argument.

      My reply:
      You, obviously, don’t “know me,” or us, BW. You have an impression of me, and of us. It’s wrong. Obviously.

      You’ll note that this post wasn’t in the least censored, because you didn’t use any dirty words. I censor no one. Ever. I WILL clean up dirty language, but that’s it. And, if you repeat the same thing over and over and over and over and over again, I might point it out and delete it… who needs all the clutter, after all? But I will NEVER, ever, ever, NOT EVER prevent you from expressing your point of view, no matter how stupid, bigoted, racist and moronic it might be.

      I EVEN allowed — and REPEATED — your friend’s fantasy about the violent death of billions of white people! It’s still there if you search “solar assassination” in our search box. Go ahead. I’ll wait. You used to accuse me of censoring you before too… even when I allowed every single thought of yours to be expressed (often verbatim, but cleaning out dirty words) and sometimes over and over and over and over again. The popular expression about “the definition of insanity being diong the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different result,” is incorrect. That IS, though, a decent description of idiocy.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Owning the left seems to be your only primary concern.

      My reply:
      Hardly. It’s ONE concern, certainly. But it’s so easy that it’s hardly the only concern.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Well, it’s your blog, and you can write whatever you want to your few readers. It just confirms me that so many of you are incredibly pathetic, and you’ve chosen to be on the wrong side of history, because your anger and fear takes precedence over reality and truth, two things you apparently have an inverse definition of. That’s why all your posts and responses sound like they were written by a spoiled child with a thesaurus having a temper tantrum over why the world isn’t made for people like him, or her, whatever gender you want to portray yourself as. Lol

      My reply:
      You got one thing right. I AM on the wrong side of history. I’m correct in my analysis, but those who were correct have failed numerous times throughout history. In Nazi Germany, for instance. People like me were right then too, but Hitler STILL took power and the results were not pretty. Same as in China, in Russia, in Eastern Europe, in Cuba, in SouthEast Asia, in North Korea, in Japan, in Africa… People like us were always right, as subsequent events proved rather persuasively. Yet, we always lost, because of people like you, who were always wrong, but who were always willing to kill others who disagreed with you. And I’m right again, but as you say, I’m on the wrong side of history. Because history, time and time and time and time and time and time again shows that idiots like you and Doug generally win.

      If that makes me pathetic, then I’m okay with that. I’d rather be pathetic than be on the inhuman, inhumane, bigoted, racist side where YOU and Doug feel so comfortable.

      And you got another thing right. It’s our blog. But, we’ve never prevented ANYONE from speaking his mind, no matter how idiotic of moronic. It’s a failing of ours, because we’ve allowed a lot of idiots to clutter up our pages, and that’s not a good thing. Many institutions of higher learning refer to our content, and have to weed through a lot of garbage from the likes of you and Doug, which is why I finally suggested that you both move along and find blogs more suited to your low level of knowledge and critical thinking. There must be elementary schoolers somewhere, putting out blogs where you can feel big and strong and knowledgeable.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Doug, if you’re reading this, you probably know what kind of person you’re dealing with when you’re having a disagreement with him/her. You’re dealing with someone who considers Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro “brilliant”. That should raise a red flag or two.

      My reply:
      Of course that would raise red flags with idiots like you. It’d be a very bad thing indeed if it didn’t! Ben Shapiro IS brilliant, and Tucker is very bright.
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      You really don’t know how ridiculous you’re being. What are you really angry and afraid of? Neither of those – by the way – are emotions to be empowered or justified when you’re fighting an unjust and unsound cause no matter what a so-called “conservative”, Republican or what Trump says.

      My reply:
      You really don’t know how ridiculous you’re being. What are you really angry and afraid of?

      The truth shall set you free, BW… but you have to be open to the truth. This ignorant little post of yours suggests you haven’t learned a single thing since last we “conversed.”

      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Maybe one day, you’ll truly wake up, stop blaming all of your fears and rage on something else other than yourself, grow and become a true conservative and fight to save conservatism instead of knowingly poisoning it on your blog and in your mind and heart.

      My reply:
      Maybe one day, you’ll truly wake up, stop blaming all of your fears and rage on something else other than yourself, grow and become a true conservative and fight to save America instead of knowingly poisoning it in your life, and in your mind and heart.

      When you went away last time, you were confessing that you didn’t have any answers to what I and others were saying. If you truly are the same bigoted bastard you were when you left last time, then you’re still an idiot, and please feel free to run along again. I really don’t have time to argue with idiots. It’s why I suggested that Doug take a hike, and I suggest you do the same. If you truly wish to engage in a meaningful exchange, then you’re going to have to elevate your content well ABOVE the pap you posted here.

      Here’s my notice to you: Since I don’t have the time to argue with idiots, if you post something full of idiocy that you’re already posted before (as is this most recent post), then I won’t censor it, but I WILL delete the parts that you’ve already said numerous times before, and replace those parts with some kind of marker indicating that you’ve already said it, and that we’ve already covered it.

      And that, I suspect, is the last we’ll hear from you!

      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

      You said:
      Take care.
      My reply:
      You too. 🙂
      – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
      Best,
       
      — x

      1. Not sure I’ve been called “ignorant”, “stupid”, and an “idiot”, so many times in a single post. Mr. Wolf is a “bigoted bastard”? ( i feel left out, kinda). Perhaps any others reading your diatribe won’t judge you as harshly.

        Personally I think you should get a grip. But.. like was mentioned earlier.. it’s your blog.

        1. In fairness, Doug, you were called “ignorant” and “stupid” only after YOU had started the name-calling first.

          Same with BW, who started the name-calling well before I ever did, and then after I had warned him repeatedly to cut it out, and he didn’t, and I joined battle, he started a long, drawn-out whine-fest, because he didn’t like it that I was doing to him what he did to others. Whew! How’s THAT for a run-on sentence! But, I liked it, so I kept it! 🙂

          After that I called you ignorant and stupid only because you proved to be ignorant and stupid.

          At least in discussing the topics we were discussing.

          Best,

          — x

          1. Lol! You’re funny.

            Maybe you don’t do it anymore… in which case, congratulations on growing up a bit!

            However, you were the one who STARTED the name-calling between us.

            Best,

            — x

          1. Nope. I never called this a debate. This is me telling you about yourself and suggesting that you take a hike again.

            If you’d like to show that you’ve grown in the past several years, then all you have to do is apologize for supporting the violent death of all white people; commit to buying me that six-pack of Bass Ale that you owe me, and fix your tone of voice here. Otherwise, I’ll continue to treat you with the same disdain you so richly deserved several years ago. 🙂

            Try it, BW, you might like it! I was the bigger “man” for years, before I succumbed to being just like you… now why don’t YOU try being a bigger man. I’ll tell you right now that I WILL accept your apology if you offer it.

            Best,

            — x

          2. If we compare who is the bigger man do we just take the other’s word for it? How do we determine if it’s the fictional “cyber size” or actual “motel size”?

  3. Okay,

    Go ahead and keep falling down that rabbit hole where QAnon, Microchips inside vaccines and Alex Jones reside.

    But don’t be surprised when you’ve hit rock bottom and you can’t climb your way out.

    1. Lol! As the racist black supremacist, YOU’RE the only QAnon-like one in attendance here.

      I already told you the country IS headed for rock-bottom — I’ve long acknowledged that — and you and your racist, bigoted ilk are dragging her there.

      Best,

      — x

  4. I thought I did apologize, but I do apologize again. But that’s it. Nothing more.

    Now, I better stop before you’ll eventually start blaming Jews for… whatever.

    1. You needed to apologize on YOUR blog. However, since you shut down your blog, I accept your apology here.

      Why would I blame Jews for anything? From where did you drag THAT weirdness, BW?!?

      By the way, so that we’re clear: for what PRECISELY are you apolgizing? Just so I know you’re not apologizing for something irrelevant… Precise, and with details, please.

      Best,

      — x

      1. I’m not going to cave in on you holding on to something I thought was passed over years ago. And I learned that “weirdness” from dealing with weirdos who rant about the same things you love to rant about i.e. the left, feminists, BLM, etc.

        1. In the meantime, you’re STILL on record as approving the violent death, by “solar assassination” — of all white people in the world.

          How, exactly, does that make ME weird, hmmmm?

          Best,

          — x

          1. Seeing as how you’ve held onto it after all these years, I’d say that’s pretty strange, if not sad, especially after an apology.

            By the way, are we ever going to talk about your post and not your racist inferiority complex?

          2. Lol! Since YOU’RE the black supremacist and racist, it’s not I who need to be concerned about any racial inferiority complex. Besides, I’m black.

            Best,

            — x

          3. I have a feeling you’ll copy and paste this response, but it further shows how sick many of you who claim to side with the right and are supposedly conservatives are. I see a lot of it on Twitter, Gab and Parler about the sickness your side is stricken with, and I see it here. And it’s nothing to be proud.

          4. The real sickness is in those who believe that people who merely disagree with them are sick.

            Welcome to the world of Fascism! You fit in perfectly!

            Best,

            — x

  5. 1. I don’t whine about slavery.

    2. I’m not a black supremacist.

    3. It’s not about disagreeing with you.

    1. (1) Lol! You whine and white and whine and white… slavery was in there.

      (2) You’re a black supremacist… and a racist.

      (3) What is it about, then?

      Best,

      — x

    1. For as long as I’ve painfully known him, xpraetorius – whenever we have our little “debates” – would always claim that he’s a black woman, and it’s always whenever race or racism is the subject. According to “her”, racism isn’t a major problem in America anymore, and any and all evidence to the contrary is automatically denied, especially if they come from left-wing sites or sites “she” considers left wing. Apparently, “she” is the only one out of the group who will argue with me.

      I honestly don’t know if it’s true if he/she is telling the truth. As you can see, his visual representative in the header is an old white dude. But as you already can see, he would try to pull these mental gymnastics on you.

      1. Agreed, Mr. Wolf. This schtick of this blog being some sort of compilation cooperative of like souls under alias’s and whatever… fluctuating racial and gender deflective personifications… as you pointed out, like the pic at the top. It’s all about the game and less about the substance… or engaging with some level of honest exchange of thought and opinion. He/she relishes in the conflict of it all. You’ve done this in here longer than I have.. which makes me wonder if we are not the real fools here. No one else bothers to reply here. Gotta be a reason for that. I suppose for me it’s the curiosity of it all. As a bit of a humanist I will sometimes follow a person to understand what makes them do what they do in here. Yet there’s a limit with that after a while as well. Hence my not often replying to this nonsense. When you think about it.. both you and I.. or one or the other.. could be one of his/her alter egos playing out a role. Kinda boggles the mind, don’t it? 🙂

        1. Doug: please feel free to leave. You haven’t contributed anything of any subxtance for a very long time. Ever since you started the name-calling and invective, you’ve been only a pest.

          As for “people never respond,” or whatever you said, we don’t do this for fame or vast interactions via the comments section. We do it for academic purposes. You WILL see our posts, and snippets and re-writes from our posts, far and wide in academia in this and in other countries. Our recent “Socialism take-down” mini-series will appear very soon in book form in two countries. We’re a polyglot bunch, and speak about a dozen and a half languages among our five regular contributors.

          You won’t see interactions here, because as you can see we discourage such exchanges with those who are not intellectually up to snuff, like you and BW.

          We shun comments; we seek views, and we get PLENTY of them. By the right people… which means, by the people who are poised to use them to subvert the dominant structures in academia. That’s working quite nicely at this time.

          In fact, if you search “xPraetorius curve” you’ll see one of our posts that’s made its way into several textbooks currently being used in universities. Under a different name, of course.

          Oh, and I feel perfectly comfortable saying this, because I KNOW it won’t be read by the people who would cause us problems. It’s being nicely censored by the very platforms we want to censor us. to keep us well under the radar. 🙂

          Best,

          — x

          1. It must be pretty noisy over there at your place when you are on the computer and there’s all that ‘LOL’ing” over there with every typed line. I know.. a nervous laugh of personal deflection.

      2. Or… I’ve always just been telling the truth, and you don’t like the truth.

        I’ve ALWAYS been either a black woman (one of those who interacted with you) or a black man.

        The “old white dude” is the “Face” of our blog. We call him ‘Sven’ (not his real name) and we simply liked his face so, with his permission, we use it to have a ‘face’ for our small, but inceasingly influential think tank.

        Pretty simple, really.

        We’ve explained it all before in many, previous posts.

        Interestingly, in all our interactions, I never questioned whether what YOU were posting was what you believed to be true. In other words, I never called you a liar, which is what you call someone who INTENDS to deceive you with what he says or writes.

        However, YOU ALWAYS called me a liar, and have suggested that all the information I’ve given you was somehow false, or a lie or whatever.

        It was always because you had no answer for the ACTUAL ideas expressed in our pages, so you went for the typical leftist gabage tactic: question the character of the person you couldn’t defeat in honest debate.

        So, again, you have dealt with three people over the years. A black woman, a white man (who has since left full-time interaction with our think tank) and the black man who took over for him.

        Nowadays, I am ALWAYS either the aforementioned black woman, or the aforementioned black man. I rarely bother telling you which, because it’s rarely relevant to the discussion. The IDEAS expressed herein are what’s relevant, and you resolutely refuse to engage those, except to say that they’re wrong, or some such tommyrot.

        Best,

        — x

  6. To be honest, Doug, I’ve dealt with xpraetorius (xp) for years when I blogged here. It wasn’t until I learned how to ban him from my page that he never returned. Even though I could’ve left it alone, I took the fight to him on his blog, because he’s the most interestingly bizarre guy I ever met. I never encountered anyone so unhinged online or in real life.

    Now, xp will likely deny what I’m about to tell you. He’ll say his usual “He started it” deflection to blame me for this this. He’ll try to turn my own words on me. He’ll paint himself out to be the victim while insulting me and calling me names. He’ll deny, lie, twist and lose his cool, and just be his usual self you’ve unfortunately come to know lol.

    I never knew he existed until xp came to comment on my post about Paula Deen and the accusations of racism. He defended her extensively while calling me a racist. He believes that calling out racism makes me a racist, especially if the accused are white. It turned into an extensive thread as getting the last word, right or wrong, is his modus operandi. And he’d go to his own blog to declare victory.

    Xp pray always claimed to be a black woman everytime he engaged with me, particularly when it came to race. He’ll say so as an attempt to perform mental gymnastics. He’ll even bring in links and videos of black conservatives to help strengthen his most basic point, that racism is no longer a major issue for blacks in America. Of course, since he claims he’s a black woman, that must mean that he or she has a point.

    Another thing xp loves to do is demand proof. But like the usual argumentative troll, nothing you’ll present is valid. According to him the media, universities and colleges, many institutions are left wing and are therefore, for lack of a better word, wrong or false. Now, I get not accepting anything biased, but to xp, nothing is independent. It’s either left or right, and like he says over and over again, the left is bad. He’ll spend more time bashing it than praising the right he supposedly belongs to.

    Strange how xp is not as quick to back up his claims. If so, of course, they’ll come from right wing figures and sites like his “favorite” the National Review and the people he admires like Ben Shapiro, Tucker Carlson, Thomas Sowell and the late Rush Limbaugh, as examples.

    He’s not above going below the belt and trying to trigger you as a way to win arguments. I admit that he got me a few times. But he’s not apologetic about it. Yet, he won’t let go of a comment made by a former commenter that I really didn’t know what to say, but understood. I even forgot about it. Yet, his anger is directed towards me for supposedly agreeing with it, and as you’ve seen, he still wants me to apologize for it even though I did years ago, and I’ve already apologized to him again recently. But xp apparently expects me to kiss his butt and beg for his and the white race’s forgiveness.

    He even wanted me to know that Africans owned European slaves. His campaign of white victimhood at the hands of black people are what he doesn’t want to be called, the hallmark of white nationalism. He even believes in that racist, white nationalist claim that white farmers are being murdered by blacks in South Africa.

    Finally, xp will pull another trick to create the illusion that he has supporters. In time, more people came to defend his comments on my blog. At first it was one, then came a few. I found out something odd as they all sounded like what he would say with the same mannerisms and all. Turns out they all shared the exact same IP address as him. It turns out they’re his sock puppets. Even though I called him out, as expected, he denies it. He claims they’re real people and try to gaslight his way out of the accusation. But it’s funny how none of those people made any comment on his own blog. Not even the regular commenters come to defend him when I came around. I only had one of his friends who had a blog of his own come at me about Black Lives Matter, and now, his blog is closed. Of course, he’ll try to make excuses, but I think he hopes I’m dumb enough to fall for it.

    Xp has been known to troll other blogs with the same recipe for condescension, name calling, lying and gaslighting.

    All in all, xp is friendly and cordial to those who essentially agree with his posts. If you disagree a little but agree overall with his essays, he’s cool and even acts like a pal. But if you disagree outright, say anything critical of the right, that’s when the demon comes out.

    He’ll condemn you if you misspell a word even though he’s one to talk.

    As you know, xp’ll call what you say stupid and you’re an “idiot” in his view. If you break down and criticize an incident or topic involving racism, he’ll call you racist if the people responsible are white. He’s against black leftists, feminists, he abhors Islam and Muslims, considers the LGBTQ community the “weird” community”, more sympathetic to white nationalists and white supremacists, even after they’ve committed a crime or two, thinks Black Lives Matter should focus on “black-on-black crime” and – more or less – believes virtually everything is left wing and conservatives are bring “unjustly” silenced and oppressed.

    You probably know that xp is not as deep or thoughtful or even as influential as he thinks he is, but he seems highly deluded to himself. I don’t even think there is a group, if there is, it probably exists in his head the way he acts towards others. (I can only imagine what he’s like in real life.) Sadly, he’s a perfect fit for the modern Republican side as some of them have gone off the deep end themselves by allowing conspiracy theorists, fascists and just those at the bottom of the barrel who entered politics and won. Not all of them are that way, thank goodness. But xp is part of that new “party” of delusional malcontents empowered by Donald Trump, divorced from reality and ready to explode at a moment’s notice.

    Honestly, xp should be left alone to rant and rave on repeat for eternity in his own world. That may be the best thing to do. But some folks think it’s better to fight those like him as they’re tanking this country. Though I don’t consider myself a leftist or right winger. But regardless of who you are in my opinion, I don’t think anyone with good sense would see what’s going on and not at least shake their heads. Xp is on the wrong side of this fight and he has no one else to blame but himself. He seems virtually incapable of seeing reality. Unfortunately, his type doesn’t believe in responsibility or accountability. He seems to far gone to notice who even he is.

    Also, I want to thank you for trying to set xp straight with facts. But as you can see it’s like pulling the teeth of a sperm whale lmao.

    By the way, you can call me Will if you want.

    1. Lol! That’ a WHOLE lotta delusional words you wrote there, BW. I hope you feel better.

      Sometimes the deluded just need to get their delusions off their chest!

      I hope it worked.

      NOW are you going to go away?

      Best,

      — x

          1. I DID know it. Of course.

            It was your word misuse in what was supposed to be a serious post that was LOL funny. It’s generally nilarious — as it was this time — when someone is trying desperately to seem serious and insightful, then makes a cringe-worthy silly error like that one.

            But, then, it was funny in a good way. I LIKE the notion of suggesting that someone is “diluted.” It’s an interesting image.

            Best,

            — x

      1. I’ve taken what you’ve said about me as your means of projection to shield yourself from the real you. And like I’ve always told you, if you want me gone, ban me yourself. Oh wait, you’re “against” censorship. That’s why you haven’t banned me then and won’t do it now.

        1. Whatever you need to keep those voices quiet!

          I haven’t banned you because I don’t ban anyone. Duh!

          I might have mentioned that, oh… 1,000,000 times before! 🙂

          Best,

          — x

    1. BW Does try, generally unsuccessfully, to write colorfully. I admire the effort, but the results are generally cringe-worthy.

      He’s lacks the self-awareness to be constantly trying to improve himself.

      Best,

      — x

          1. You regularly show your talent for repeating popular buzzwords with the Left. Why don’t you try thinking sometime… just to do something different?

            You won’t be good at it at firdt, because you lack the required practice, but if you keep at it, you might improve.

            Best,

            — x

      1. Like the woman who says no but really means yes…. you do have the power to ban me or prevent my replies…. but you do not. I actually do think you exhibit many female nuances to your prose.

          1. If I had my druthers I’d rather address the lady in the house. Ladies tend to provide a bit more authenticity in their responses.

      2. I think he enjoys our company more than he/she lets on.

        Xp, I have a feeling that in person, you wouldn’t act the same way you respond online if you were to meet someone with differing opinions and thoughts. I think you only talk this way, because you’re safe behind a screen with your identity concealed.

        If we’re such a problem, just ban us, man. You know how, don’t you?

        But you won’t, because – like you said – you don’t ban anyone. I’m guessing you don’t want to be like those sites – I guess – you deem are leftist, because of the mass booting out of right wing voices who have been kicked out for saying and doing things that are considered morally repugnant and basically offensive by those who still believe in responsibility and accountability.

        By the way, you do know you’ve indulged more about yourself than the topic of this blog. You always seem to dive into that trap where you have to go on the offensive not so much about the subject, but about how you supposedly know better and how we who disagree with you are idiots or say nothing but stupid things. I’m no expert, but it shows a sign of a massively fragile ego. I can practically feel your ego bruised on the other side of this computer, and your offensiveness to Doug, me and all others who argued with you is to compensate for something you’re seriously lacking. And it shows when you project your inadequacies on us just like you’ll probably do in your response.

        By the way, I wasn’t trying to read your mind. (Remember that defense?) You present your mind everytime you write on this blog either as an entry or a response. So, I’m just going by what I read and what you write.

        So yeah, you could ban us, but I just think you like the attention we’re paying you with interest. It’s just another sign of you seeking what you lack.

        But all in all, are you ever going to go back on your topic? Do you even really care anymore? Are you doing to needlessly address every point with a response to those points? Are you going to bemoan any spelling and grammar mistakes while ignoring your own? Are you going to turn my own words against me? Are you going to call me names? Are you going to tell me to leave, but won’t force your hand, because you either don’t know how or you enjoy the attention I’m giving you?

        Honestly, like I’ve said, the delusional, far-right wing community would embrace you with open arms. If that’s your thing, knock yourself out, buddy.

        1. Apologies… this went into moderation, and I don’t know why.

          I’ll respond later. Needless to say, much of it is wrong, but it’s possible you got some things right.

          However, if (1) what you’ve said is irrelevant, or (2) I’ve been over it many times before, then I’ll just note that and move on.

          Quickly, though: What part of “I don’t ban people” are you having difficulty understanding? I don’t think it’s a hard notion to grasp.

          Best,

          — x

          1. I understand it perfectly. I just don’t think you understand that you can’t tell people to leave your blog and expect them to do so.

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s