RGI Watch (1/26/18): The Covington High School Media Scandal


At the recent March for Life in Washington D.C. a group of High School kids went from Covington, High School in Kentucky. After the march was over, the kids were waiting for their bus to bring them to the airport for the trip home.

It was during this wait that a bunch of racist goons calling themselves something like “Black Hebrew Israelites,” approached the kids and began to rain steady abuse on them. Much of the taunting yelled at the young teen kids is unprintable.

How did the kids respond? They began to do a bunch of the school spirit chants they had learned at Covington. You know, things like: “Yea rah rah, Covington!” I don’t know the actual chants, but that’s the nature of them. Hardly rugged stuff; in the face of some really despicable abuse by… “adults.” Chronological adults, anyway.

Then, in the midst of all this silliness — though it was silliness that must have appeared quite menacing to a bunch of teens from a parochial school in Kentucky — in marched one Nathan Phillips, who then got up in the face of one of the teens — a certain Nicholas Sandmann — banging a drum and chanting.

How did the Covington teens respond to that? They began to chant back at Phillips. This , along with a tomahawk chop thing, was, it turns out, the worst thing the kids did during the entire two hour encounter involving the Covington High kids, the “Black Hebrew Israelite” goons and Nathan Phillips. Oh, some of the kids were wearing hats that said, “Make America Great Again.”

And that’s what got caught by “journalists” who “covered” the incident — if by “covering the incident,” you mean: fabricated a story around a video taken out of context and didn’t have either the integrity or the intelligence to do the work necessary to find out the real story or to report it.

Needless to say, the press ran with the kids’ pretty tame response to Phillips’ provocation, and fabricated a narrative: “MAGA hat-wearing high school kids engage in racist taunting of Native American elder, Nathan Phillips.” Why did the media invent and spread this lie? Simple: the fake narrative comported perfectly with the so-called “journalists'” preconceived notions.

In so “reporting,” the media got the story exactly 180 degrees wrong.  The Covington kids were doing nothing wrong; just waiting for their bus. They were accosted by the “Black Hebrew Israelite” goons, and were the recipients of a fusillade of disgusting verbal abuse from the goons.

Then, Nathan Phillips came in and got up in the face of the student. Phillips’ presence was plainly intended to intimidate and provoke the teens.

How do I know all this? Simple: one of the “Black Hebrew Israelite” goons, inconveniently, filmed the entire two-hour fiasco, and released it to the public. That video showed quite clearly that the Covington High kids were completely innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever in the whole spectacle.

Plus, everything that Phillips said after the incident, to an adoring media corps, was a lie. He accused the Covington High kids of doing exactly what the video of the event showed him doing. From that we can logically deduce that since he accused the kids of trying to intimidate and provoke him, really he was there to intimidate and provoke the kids.

I watched the abridged video (here) and it shows nothing bad whatsoever being done by the Covington kids. Hold on… one of the kids does a “tomahawk chop” thing partway through the video, and that’s it. Sorry: the “tomahawk” chop thing should be offensive to no one.

The kid, Nick Sandmann, with the so-called “smug expression” on his face? He simply stood there smiling at Phillips as the “Native American elder” chanted and banged his drum right in his face. Nicholas Sandmann is 16 years old. How do you think you might have reacted when you were 16 years old? Remember: young Sandmann had also just endured, along with his schoolmates, a long period of verbal abuse by the “Black Hebrew Israelite” goons.

Others have written more and better on this sorry display of Leftist thuggery, along with journalist incompetence and malfeasance, but here’s the thing that I want to point out: After it became clear that the media had been 100% wrong, and had completely wrongly identified the abusers as victims and the victims as abusers, no one in the left-wing media took back their initial false stories. 

Here’s an instructive post in the left-wing Daily Kos. It has some 637 comments (and counting, presumably). In those comments, the string-the-kids-up bunch struggles desperately to hang onto their precious Racist-White-High-School-Kids narrative. There are some among the hundreds of comments who deal rationally with the facts that come out as they come out, and as those facts show that the narrative is… wrong. However, more of them just keep on keepin’ on, and it’ll be the kids’ fault forever in their minds.

Surely these same people continue to believe that the Duke LaCrosse team is guilty of rape, and the Rolling Stone false rape accuser is a truth-teller as well.

Remember: these were not only false stories, the truth was exactly the opposite of what was being reported. Only the right-wing media walked back their initial condemnation of the High School kids.

The result of this is that you can still see crap like this in the blogosphere. Yes, it’s our old pal Brothawolf, the racist black man who went with the original false news “reporting,” and, like the rest of the Left, has not issued either a retraction or an apology, and has, in fact, doubled down on his fabrications.

Another member of the RGI commenting on the incident is Abagond, another racist black man who ran with the false narrative and is, apparently, sticking with it. The above link to his thoughts on the whole thing is from the 25th of this month — yesterday — long after it became well known that the Covington High students weren’t the ones in the wrong in the story.

Brothawolf’s essay ends on this classy note:

It’s one thing to act like d**ks in public. It’s another to not own up to d**kish behavior, try to avoid any means of accountability, scapegoat others and yet, somehow feel proud at the end of the day. That seems to be the theme of the Trump-supporting troglodytes.

Now that it’s been revealed that Brothawolf acted “like a d**ck,” can we expect an apology or retraction from him? Likely not.

Here are some of the responses to Brothawolf’s ghoulish post:

These same wing nuts chanting “Build That Wall” [Editor’s note: This has since been debunked. There were no chants of “Build that wall.” It should be noted that there’s nothing wrong with supporting a policy of building a wall on the border.] are the same clown sticks criticizing black folks who kneel at that racist National Anthem and lying about disrespecting military veterans.  But here we are witnessing a turd white supremacist  disrespecting a military veteran of Native American heritage [Editor’s note: Phillips claimed to be a Vietnam Veteran. He was not. He was in the military during the Vietnam era, never went to Vietnam, and received a less than honorable discharge due to some bad behavior. Furthermore, Sandmann had no way of knowing Phillips’ past military status]. Hypocrisy is real here.

 

This same “Mary Burrell” harpy goes on to say the following (I’ve put “[debunked]” next to the falsehoods in her comment):

That Covington Catholic School were (sic) these Hitler youth attend has a history of racism [debunked] and racist incidents [debunked] occurring there. This school is nothing but a breeding ground for another generation of white supremacist. [debunked]

 

Now, it’s possible that Brothawolf’s feature, published on the 22nd of this month, came out before people figured out that all that they had heard about the Covington High kids was wrong, so let’s see what Brothwolf has to say a few days further down the road. Surely he’s acknowledged his “mistake,” and apologized and published something about the real story, right?

Wrong.

Here’s Brothawolf’s next installment on the saga. That one was posted last Thursday — two day ago. Long, long after it had become clear that the Covington kids had done nothing wrong. Here’s what BW says about it, after all that he’d previously written had been throughout debunked. Important Note: the debunking came from a video of the entire two-hour incident posted by someone from Phillips’ group! This was not a video that anyone could pretend had been edited. Here’s Brothawolf’s latest about the affair (I’ve placed “[debunked]” after those things that are now known to be false:

Lastly, for now, you remember the MAGA teens who were trying to start something [debunked] with Native American veteran Nathan Phillips at the March For Life in Washingtonthe other day and one of them, Nick Sandmann, had a smug smile [debunked] on his face that was begging to be punched [debunked]? [Editor’s Note: You can characterize Sandmann’s smile as a “smug smile,? or a “smirk,” all you want, but that’s just an opinion. It could also be characterized as a tense smile, as Nathan Phillips is plainly in Sandmann’s face taunting him. In retrospect, it appears that Sandmann acted perfectly appropriately, given the circumstances. It’s notable how the Left always retreats to threats of violence. Brothawolf is no exception.]

Well, there’s more.

The school in which these thugs [debunked] hail from (Covington Catholic High School in Kentucky) looks even worse [debunked] thanks to reports and videos highlighting how they also made rape jokes [debunked], harassed women [debunked] and wore black face [debunked]. The videos are uploaded here to prove it. Viewer discretion is advised. [Editor’s note: This is more theatrics on Brothwolf’s part. The videos are quite tame.]

As usual, the drumbeats denying that any of the delinquents involved are racist are being played [Editor’s note: Well, since the entire narrative has been completely debunked, it’s perfectly appropriate that there would be people coming to the defense of the high school kids.]. And of course, Trump weighed in on the incidents reciting from the alt-right script of defending the offenders and crying fake news. [The “news” reports about the incident were, indeed, fake news. There should be nothing surprising about President Trump coming to the kids’ defense. And “fake news” is something that Trump is known to say. This is nothing at all surprising.]

Now look, to all the white followers and readers of this blog, let me reassure you that I DON’T hate white people.[debunked. Editor’s note: Brothawolf is an avowed racist. What, serious question, is a racist like Brothawolf doing with his racism? Loving white people? On his blog he continues to have a post (here) that fantasizes about the violent extermination of all white people(1). He endorsed that post, and he has refused to renounce on his blog either the post or the sentiment expressedFrankly, I don’t see how being sick and tired of the racist, sexist and Islamophobic bullshit done by (mostly) white males in these instances is considered wrong. [Editor’s note: Saying someone is guilty of something of which he demonstrably is not, is very, very wrong. Obviously. It’s what racists do. Brothawolf is a racist.] Saying otherwise is a sign of moral bankruptcy and intellectual dishonesty. These fools DO NOT represent all white people, but they are products of a destructive culture within human nature. [Editor’s Note: except that the story that supposedly leads to this conclusion is… demonstrably false.]

I won’t sugarcoat it like some news media outlets do. We live in times where fear, ignorance and hate are used as tools for leanring (sic), survival and pride, where the definition of ‘truth’ is becoming more and more subjective and watered down, and where progress is being derailed all for the sake for keeping hate, ignorance and fear going. [Editor’s Note: This is some incoherent, slapdash twaddle that says nothing meaningful. Where is Brothawolf’s evidence of what he says here? Especially since the story that’s supposed to support this last paragraph is… false. Literal fake news.]


The actions of the bad actors in this incident — Nathan Phillips, the Black Hebrew Israelites, the media, the Race Grievance Industry, the Left in general — are abhorrent. Disgusting. They’re an affront to all that is good and decent, and Americans with any shred of decency left in them at all need to decry this travesty.

The Covington kids are… kids for crying out loud! Furthermore, they did nothing wrong at all. People like Brothawolf and Abagond, who appear incapable of admitting it when they’ve done or said wrong, and who are thereby willing to harm young children because of the color of their skin, are ghoulish exemplars of what the Left has come to in America. 

In a final note: as the rest of Leftist and Leftish America clings to their blind hatred of anyone and anything that doesn’t adhere to their simplistic, childish viewpoints, the Covington High kids have demonstrated amazing grace in the face of a massive outpouring of violent hostility coming at them. None expressed any bitterness at all, and even Nick Sandmann said of Nathan Phillips — a man who lied about Sandmann to national media — “I respect him. I’d like to talk with him.” That’s it.

Wow!

Again, do you think that your sixteen-year old self could respond even close to that maturely or gracefully in the face of screaming hatred and death threats coming at you after you had done nothing wrong?

The real racism in America is, obviously, on the Left.

— xPraetorius

Notes:


(1) Here’s the quote:

Yurugu is feeling, slightly, the sins of his twisted, diseased, diabolical past, present and future with rising alarm. Having zero concept of karma, they are “stunned” and “caught off guard” as to why the entire Colored world harbours feelings of resentment and anger towards them.

Being deficient of melanin, the God Principle of the planet, they are unable to experience remorse and humility. They know, intrinsically, that they shall reap the benefits of what they have planted but arrogance will never permit them to admit it.

Their rising fear will manifest into more crimes against us and more laws restricting us but it will be of no avail. Yurugu WILL PERISH off the planet. Either by ways of the sword or by ways of Mother Nature. My wish is for a solar assassination of their nasty, beastiality-loving, pale a**es.

By (sic) f***ers.

Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out!

On second thought…I hope the door hits them real hard.

 

And here’s Brothawolf’s response:

If it does hit them, they’ll likely blame it on blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and anyone else. lol

 

Lol! Hahahaha! How jolly to wish for the extermination of more than a billion people! How droll and comical!

To repeat: The real racism in America is, obviously, on the Left.

 

 

 

77 thoughts on “RGI Watch (1/26/18): The Covington High School Media Scandal

  1. Still can’t get enough of me I see.

    A few things here.

    First, where is YOUR proof that the media coverage of this incident was a lie? There are no links to anything that backs up your claim. The video I saw only shows what the media reported and what actual eyewitnesses saw, teen boys who surrounding and poking fun at a Native American elder who simply sang and beat his drum.

    Second, according to reports, Nathan Phillips was trying to diffuse a tense situation between the Black Israelites and the MAGA teens. Where your proof that he was part of the problem?

    Third, you’re defending the teens without any evidence that they did nothing wrong. And yes, they were teens. But what if those teens were black or brown and DIDN’T wore MAGA hats? Would you still defend them then?

    Fourth, how is what Abagond wrote on his blog fake? Where’s the evidence to show it?

    You’ve “debunked” most of what was said, but provided nothing to show why it’s debunked. You’ve pretty much done what you always do, say how it’s wrong without any or much references. It’s just a long and empty defense of bad behavior by white male youth and a declaration that any news piece reporting on such behavior is automatically fake with nothing to back it up.

    1. Lol! Do you really want to go down this road, BW?

      I admit I was wrong about you. for years I figured that deep down inside you there was a decent man struggling to get out. I was wrong. You’re just a bigoted bastard, and a bad person. A sheep in wolf’s clothing. The result is that I’m not going to go easy on you anymore, as I did before. Now, I’m going to speak frankly, as is appropriate with a racist, bigoted bastard. So, I’ll reply to this one — for old times’ sake. Then, if you wish, you can slink off with your sheep’s tail between your legs and rejoin the other collection of bigoted bastards you’ve assembled at your poor excuse for a Stormfront-esque blog.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      Still can’t get enough of me I see.
      My Reply:
      cf your Jeff Jacoby post.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      A few things here.
      My Reply:
      Okay
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      First, where is YOUR proof that the media coverage of this incident was a lie? There are no links to anything that backs up your claim. The video I saw only shows what the media reported and what actual eyewitnesses saw, teen boys who surrounding and poking fun at a Native American elder who simply sang and beat his drum.
      My Reply:
      Lol! My proof is all around. You’d see it if you were to read or consume more than only your left-wing sources… you know, watch FOX News once in a while, you doofus! If you were to do that, you’d see that there’s a video of the complete incident — taken by someone in Nathan Phillips’ entourage, and released to the public — that plainly shows that Phillips confronted the kids, not the other way around. Phillips got into the kid’s face, not the other way around. Phillips harassed the kids, not the other way around. Again, if you were to consume other sources than just those that agree with you, you’d be aware of this. By the way, my post referenced that video. Other sources that are now admitting that the media got it wrong:
      • Jake Tapper (CNN).
      • The Washington Post is at least reporting that the diocese where Covington High is apologizing to the students for initially condemning their behavior.
      • The New York Times reported that Nathan Phillips lied about:
         — His military service — he was not in Vietnam.
         — No one “spat at him and called him a baby killer when he came home,” as he claimed, because he never went to Vietnam.
         — His discharge was not honorable, because he had had to be disciplined four times while in the service; one time sent him to the brig for a stretch.
      • I put in a link to the Daily Kos — a hard-leftist site. In the post at that link, the story got it wrong, but in the comments section (there were 637 comments ast the time) I read as the various commenters reacted to the changing facts on the ground. At the end of the comments section, everyone had admitted that the kids were not to blame, but now they were all looking for something else to pin on them. Some moron took a three-point sign at a basketball game to be a Nazi salute; another idiot misinterpreted a school pep rally in which students colored themselves in all different colors — including black — as an overt “blackface” incident. It wasn’t. Bottom Line: people knew they’d gotten it wrong, and were struggling not to have to admit it to anyone. Because, like you, none of them were man enough. Oh, read the comments of one “pukaev” and “DreamsOfABlueNation” — leftists both. I did. Both those commenters realized that the bleating herd had got it wrong, and were trying to restore some sanity to the discussion. After all, the majority of the commenters were ready to ruin the lives of (1) innocent people, and (2) kids.
      So, your assertion that “there are no links to anything that backs up my claim” is false on its face. I linked to people on your side to prove my point! Doofus. I’m going to be charitable and suggest that you didn’t read the post, and aren’t just lying.
      Oh, one more quick point: I just proved to you also that I diligently seek out sources that don’t agree with me. You, plainly, don’t.

      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      Second, according to reports, Nathan Phillips was trying to diffuse a tense situation between the Black Israelites and the MAGA teens. Where your proof that he was part of the problem?
      My Reply:
      I told you. There’s a video released by Nathan Phillips’ friend that clearly shows the entire incident. And the word is “defuse.” Honestly, BW… do you have the vocabulary to do this? You’re doing it on a computer, for crying out loud! One word: dictionary.com. Use it once in a while.
      In an interesting aside, I’ve seen this same basic mistake a bunch of times. It’s because Nathan Phillips said that he was trying to “defuse” the situation. I always see the Left making this third-grade mistake! It makes you wonder: if they don’t have the vocabulary, then they also probably don’t have the learning. If they don’t have the learning, then they also don’t have the analytical skills. If they have no analytical skills, they also have no critical thinking skills. In other words they’re ignoramuses, without the necessary skills to stop being ignoramuses. And they presume to pronounce on current events?!?

      Over and over and over and over again we see it: The Left is crammed full of ignorant, bigoted bastards, too stupid to put together a coherent thought, too vainglorious to understand their own limitations, and bereft of the skills and aptitudes necessary to become informed and knowledgeable.
      The full video plainly shows that Phillips got in the faces of just the kids and not the faces of the “Black Hebrew Israelites.” He wasn’t trying to defuse anything.
      It’s not surprising that Phillips acted this way. The BHI’ers are known to be abusive, they’re adults, and they sure look and sound menacing. Phillips confronted… young kids. Ooooo… big, brave man! He was not trying to “defuse” anything; rather, he was hoping to provoke an incident. Yes, when young Nick Sandmann didn’t rise to the bait, it must have been frustrating for the bullying, belligerent half-wit, Phillips. After all, Sandmann proved to be more of an adult than he was!

      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      Third, you’re defending the teens without any evidence that they did nothing wrong. And yes, they were teens. But what if those teens were black or brown and DIDN’T wore MAGA hats? Would you still defend them then?
      My Reply:
      I just gave you my evidence. The complete video that showed Phillips invading the teens’ space, and not the other way ’round. The complete video that showed Philips harassing the teens, and not the other way ’round. The complete video that showed the “Black Hebrew Israelites” harassing the teens. All this is known all over America now, and it’s been known for days now. Read something. Consume some news/information sources other than your left-wing, neanderthal blogs.
      I don’t care what color the teens were, or what they were wearing, if a bunch of racist goon bullies comes up and abuses them, I’m rising to the kids’ defense. You’re a racist, so you wouldn’t understand this, but I see people… you see skin color. It’s because you’re a bigoted bastard, and you hang around only with bigoted bastards. I know this, because you’ve banned anyone who disagrees with you from your poor excuse for a blog.

      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
      You said:
      You’ve “debunked” most of what was said, but provided nothing to show why it’s debunked. You’ve pretty much done what you always do, say how it’s wrong without any or much references. It’s just a long and empty defense of bad behavior by white male youth and a declaration that any news piece reporting on such behavior is automatically fake with nothing to back it up.
      My Reply:
      Lol! Thank you for this! My evidence was… the complete video. You just told me that the actual video of an incident is insufficient evidence for drawing any conclusions! I guess we have to toss out all those other videos — to which you’re constantly referring — that show unarmed black men being killed by cops. Toss ’em all out! Brothawolf — howling for Justice! — says to! They’re meaningless, Brothawolf says! They dont show anything! Brothawolf says so! No sense in cops having body or dash cams! Brothawolf says the videos are — let’s use his words — “nothing to back it up!” Wow! Who’d have thought it?!?!?
      You said: “It’s just a long and empty defense of bad behavior by white male youth” — you just libeled a bunch of innocent people. Are you man enough to apologize? I’ll answer the question for you: Nope. You’re not. You’re a bigogted bastard, and you’ll remain a bigoted bastard. You didn’t get that way by being an intelligent, rational observer of things around you.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      Now, why don’t you just go away, and continue howling in your echo chamber about how black racism is okay, but that you’re somehow “anti-racism,” and that white kids who get bullied and harassed by a pathological liar out to get his 15 minutes of fame are somehow in the wrong… because they’re white kids. Yeah. How “anti-racist” of you!
      As I said in an earlier post: The new racists will come waving the banner of anti-racism.
      The new racists are here, and you’re one of them.

      As a reminder: if my tone seems a bit contemptuous, it’s meant to be. I’ve arrived at the point where the only emotion I have for you now is contempt. I was wrong about you. You’re not a good person with some misguided viewpoints, you’re a bad person, with some stupid, ignorant, ill-informed, ignorant, ugly viewpoints; a person unwilling to learn, to grow, to correct your many and manifest serious character flaws, and to become a good person. And I don’t like you.

      Best,

      — x

    2. Sorry: I forgot this item of yours: Fourth, how is what Abagond wrote on his blog fake? Where’s the evidence to show it?

      Dude: Abagond — racist bastard that he is — said the same thing all the other media outlets said. Before it was clearly proven they were wrong.

      He’s provided no apology or retraction either. Why? Easy: he’s a bigoted bastard.

      Best,

      — x

  2. You mad?

    Okay. Let’s get the emotional baggage out of the way before I respond. As a side note, yes. Let’s go down this road.

    First off, YOU told me that one cannot be hurt by words unless one allows those word to hurt them, right? Or something of that nature. Well, I can see that you can’t even follow your own advice, because what I said was obviously hurtful to you. You could say it was offensive. Whatever. You telling me you don’t like me, which I could care less, and calling me names is proof of that. You also told me how nothing I could say offends you. That’s also an apparent lie, because you’re clearly offended. So, you can’t teach me lessons that you yourself DON’T learn from.

    Also, I would love it if you were to explain to me how my blog is “Stormfront-esque”. The comment you won’t let go is a given. I wish to see more explanations one day whenever you’re ready.

    Moving on to the issue.

    You mentioned news articles and videos, did you not? Well, WHERE ARE THEY? Where are the links to these articles? Where’s the videos? Where are the sources so others can look them up and see for themselves what you’re talking about?

    I don’t see any. All I see is you calling what you claim as proof and NOTHING to reference them in any way. No links. No videos. NOTHING. You can’t even prove how Abagond is also wrong. So, I’m just going to assume that you have NO evidence whatsoever to make your claims strong.

    As for that one video that you DID link, I saw (mostly) white and male teens surrounding an elderly Native American mocking and laughing at him. Whatever Nathan Phillips did to provoke those teens was still NO EXCUSE for them to act the way they did towards him. Period. You can’t spin this when what the video shows is MORE than obvious.

    By the by, I’m aware of the Black Israelites and I DO NOT cosign with their behavior in the least. Even if you say I do, I do not support such groups or their actions.

    In conclusion, you can call me racist all you want, but you’re deluding yourself if you don’t think you harbor a racist bone in your body, the blogger or group of bloggers who blamed black “racists” for creating white nationalists which, if any historian were to read this, they would probably give you an urgent history lesson after they finished laughing at your post.

    In the end, you have a need to defend any and all white people accused of racism. Your usual reply is to call those who call them out on their racism are racists. That’s EXACTLY what you’re doing here. That’s what you’ve BEEN doing. Anyone can see that as plain as day.

    So, if you want to get mad at me for pointing things out, okay. If you’re mad that I WON’T take what you said at face value, go ahead.

    1. You Said:
      You mad?
      My Reply:
      Nope.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      Okay. Let’s get the emotional baggage out of the way before I respond. As a side note, yes. Let’s go down this road.
      My Reply:
      Ummmm… Okay. Whatever. Drop the drama, BW.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      First off, YOU told me that one cannot be hurt by words unless one allows those word to hurt them, right? Or something of that nature. Well, I can see that you can’t even follow your own advice, because what I said was obviously hurtful to you. You could say it was offensive. Whatever. You telling me you don’t like me, which I could care less, and calling me names is proof of that. You also told me how nothing I could say offends you. That’s also an apparent lie, because you’re clearly offended. So, you can’t teach me lessons that you yourself DON’T learn from.
      My Reply:
      • Nope. words can’t hurt anyone.
      • Nope. What you said was not hurtful to me. Your words didn’t hurt me, or offend me.
      • Nope. Your words were not offensive to me. They were stupid, but not offensive.
      • I’m glad you don’t care that I don’t like you.
      • Correct: Nothing you could say offends me. I’ve never once been offended by you, or by what you’ve said. I’m simply addressing you in a more appropriate way. I was always nice and polite to you, and I thought I liked you, and, more importantly, I thought you were worthy of my affection and respect. I was wrong. So, now I’m talking to you as I should have long ago.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      Also, I would love it if you were to explain to me how my blog is “Stormfront-esque”. The comment you won’t let go is a given. I wish to see more explanations one day whenever you’re ready.
      My Reply:
      I don’t need to explain beyond that comment. You still have an opportunity to reject it, and you choose not to. Have you ever read any of the comments on your blog? I’ve never seen remotely that much racist hatred on other sites. You never reject the comments that show your group’s hatred of people merely because of the color of their skin. Classic Stormfront-esque crap. From bigoted bastards.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      Moving on to the issue.

      You mentioned news articles and videos, did you not? Well, WHERE ARE THEY? Where are the links to these articles? Where’s the videos? Where are the sources so others can look them up and see for themselves what you’re talking about?

      My Reply:
      I gave you the way to find the videos, and I don’t generally link to others’ materials. You know this. I can’t do all the work for you, BrothaDuck.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      I don’t see any. All I see is you calling what you claim as proof and NOTHING to reference them in any way. No links. No videos. NOTHING. You can’t even prove how Abagond is also wrong. So, I’m just going to assume that you have NO evidence whatsoever to make your claims strong.
      My Reply:
      You don’t see any evidence, because you choose not to. I gave you complete instructions in the previous post for how to find the videos. Those instructions weren’t needed. Anyone could find the video. Get off your fat behind, and do something.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      As for that one video that you DID link, I saw (mostly) white and male teens surrounding an elderly Native American mocking and laughing at him. Whatever Nathan Phillips did to provoke those teens was still NO EXCUSE for them to act the way they did towards him. Period. You can’t spin this when what the video shows is MORE than obvious.
      My Reply:
      You saw what you wanted to see. That’s all. There were even leftists who recognized that they’d falsely accused a bunch of fresh-faced, innocent kids. There were even some leftists who were, rightly, deeply ashamed. You, I suspect, are incapable of shame, though.
      I’m glad you admit that Nathan Phillips provoked the kids. What they did was perfectly appropriate, considering that Phillips was doing what he could to start a fight. Phillips is a moron and a fraud, and he plainly tried to incite the kids to violence. The kids did the exactly right thing: they mocked the bastard. He deserved to be mocked. However, he was never in any kind of danger, as the video plainly showed. That made his lies on all the talk shows about feeling threatened and in danger all the more laughable when the video from Phillips’ own entourage proved what a liar he is.

      Yep, the kids acted perfectly appropriately; in fact, it’s time for all of us on the Right to take off the gloves. There are amazingly mockable nitwits, half-wits, morons, idiots, drooling, slack-jawed, mouth-breathing, vacant-eyed, air-headed cretins on the Left — Phillips is one of them — and they need to be mocked.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      By the by, I’m aware of the Black Israelites and I DO NOT cosign with their behavior in the least. Even if you say I do, I do not support such groups or their actions.
      My Reply:
      Dude: you left the “Black Hebrew Israelites’ beahvior” far, far behind, long, long ago. You “co-signed” the desire that all white people die a violent death. And you’ve since refused to repudiate that fantasy, in public, on your blog. I don’t have to say anything about what you “co-sign.” You’ve said it all yourself.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      In conclusion, you can call me racist all you want, but you’re deluding yourself if you don’t think you harbor a racist bone in your body, the blogger or group of bloggers who blamed black “racists” for creating white nationalists which, if any historian were to read this, they would probably give you an urgent history lesson after they finished laughing at your post.
      My Reply:
      You are a racist. Want proof? One word: “whiteness.” Only a racist would ever say a word like “whiteness,” which pretends that people have certain immutable characteristics because their skin is white, rather than recognizing a person’s humanity, no matter the color of his skin. That’s why you can search through the nearly 3,000 posts on our blog, and you’ll never once find the term “blackness” used as a way to try to define a person’s quality as a person.

      Now, let’s search for the term “whiteness” at BrothaDuck’s blog. Well, whaddya know?!? One hundred seventy-seven entries! (here)

      Here are just a few of the headlines in those pieces that tell us all about people just because of the color of their skin:

      • The Best Explanation of Whiteness To Date – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2017/08/…/the-best-explanation-of-whiteness-to-dat…
      Aug 24, 2017 – Through experience, when mentioning or discussing whiteness, white privilege, white supremacy, white anything, there is at least one white …

      • Whiteness Hurts White People – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/whiteness-hurts-white-people/
      May 20, 2013 – The mindset of whiteness keeps white people feeling like shining examples of moral values despite their psychopathic and sociopahtic …

      • The Fragility of Whiteness: White Feelings Matter More Than Reality …
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/…/the-fragility-of-whiteness-white-feelings-matter-…
      Aug 29, 2016 – First off, I want to say that this post is NOT about all white people. I repeat; this post is NOT in any way about all white people. This topic is about …

      • The Fear of Losing Whiteness – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2012/08/09/the-fear-of-losing-whiteness/
      Aug 9, 2012 – It’s not only based on economics, but also the normalization of whiteness. Plus, the stronghold of white supremacy is temporary like …

      • Whiteness In the Election and the Courts – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2016/06/…/whiteness-in-the-election-and-the-courts…
      Jun 11, 2016 – At first, I thought about waiting until Monday to express my thoughts on current situations. But I decided to go ahead and write my thoughts on …

      • Losing Whiteness: Why White People Are So Pissed – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/…/losing-whiteness-why-white-people-are-so-pissed…
      Feb 1, 2017 – The list goes on and on making whiteness as not only the default, but also the ultimate level of human kind, the highest platform in a racial caste …

      • White People are Sociopaths – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/white-people-are-sociopaths/
      Mar 1, 2013 – So now, I’m sitting here reflecting on the whole fiasco, counting all the fails not only with team whiteness bu with my own. One of them being …

      • Voting For Whiteness – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/voting-for-whiteness/
      Nov 5, 2012 – Brother Peacemaker wrote a blog post concerning Colin Powell’s announcement to support and endorse President Barack Obama’s re-election …

      • Violent Whiteness (Updated) – BROTHA WOLF
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/2012/08/07/violent-whiteness/
      Aug 7, 2012 – Whiteness has a tendency to make people identity others based on appearance alone. When that group is seen as a threat or is deemed …

      • White Women’s Whiteness Wins: More White Women Chose Trump …
      https://brothawolf.wordpress.com/…/white-womens-whiteness-wins-more-white-wome…
      Nov 9, 2016 – White women placed whiteness ahead of feminism. I’m no expert, but I would imagine feminists would rather die a million painful deaths than …

      On the other hand, I’m not a racist. Our blog didn’t say that black racists “created white nationalists,” but that black racists had an important part in making white nationalists as they are. And that’s simply true. Historical fact, in fact.

      Those are, of course, despicable headlines that I pointed out.

      Man! Can you imagine if we were ever to post a headline that read:
      • “Black People are Sociopaths”?

      Yikes!!!

      Correctly, we’d have a ton of condemnation on our noggins immediately!
      How about if we were to write a blurb like this disgusting gem: “The mindset of blackness keeps black people feeling like shining examples of moral values despite their psychopathic and sociopahtic …“?

      That’s the blurb that you wrote on your blog… only you wrote “white” where I wrote “black.” When I call you a bigoted bastard, I’m being nice to you.

      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      In the end, you have a need to defend any and all white people accused of racism. Your usual reply is to call those who call them out on their racism are racists. That’s EXACTLY what you’re doing here. That’s what you’ve BEEN doing. Anyone can see that as plain as day.
      My Reply:
      Lol! More of BrothaDuck’s mystical, magical mind-reading powers. Hey, I can play that game too. Plainly you have a desire to abuse children and to look the other way as black people die. Your agenda is obviously to keep black people down, because that’s what your words say, and what the policies you support do. You have a need to defend all black racists because you’re a black racist, and you don’t want to have to defend your despicable racism. That’s EXACTLY what you’re doing here. That’s what you’ve BEEN doing. Anyone can see that as plain as day.
      – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

      You Said:
      So, if you want to get mad at me for pointing things out, okay. If you’re mad that I WON’T take what you said at face value, go ahead.
      My Reply:
      Okay. But, I’m not mad at you. I simply don’t respect or like you. You’re not worth my anger.

      Best,

      — x

      1. 1. Whatever makes you feel – or LOOK – better. You say words don’t hurt you, okay. I’ll keep that in mind the next time you call me a bigoted bastard or some other name.

        2. Yes, you can’t do ALL the work for me or anyone. But you won’t do ANY of the work.

        Also, you demand the opposition to provide proof and evidence to you, but you have a problem doing the same for the opposition. That’s hypocrisy, in case you didn’t know.

        3. It’s not enough to compare me to Stormfront without any references from both my blog AND Stormfront.

        4. No matter how you spin or reword this, you’re still defending the racist actions of teens the same way far-right people have done and are doing. How are you no different?

        5. Have you even bothered to research what “whiteness” means as opposed to assume you know what it means or what it refers to? If not, one can only guess that you’re pushing a false agenda.

        6. You think changing words makes no difference in what the statement says? If so, it shows that you either you don’t know what racism TRULY is or that’s part of your agenda you’re pushing for your readers whom, I’m guessing, you assume will take everything you write at face value.

        7. Brother Duck is a new one. Makes me sound like a Disney character.

        8. I may not be worth your anger, but you STILL take time out to reply to a racist, moronic, bigoted bastard like me. So, I’m still worth something valuable to you.

        1. You Said:
          1. Whatever makes you feel – or LOOK – better. You say words don’t hurt you, okay. I’ll keep that in mind the next time you call me a bigoted bastard or some other name.
          My Reply:
          Okay.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          2. Yes, you can’t do ALL the work for me or anyone. But you won’t do ANY of the work.
          Also, you demand the opposition to provide proof and evidence to you, but you have a problem doing the same for the opposition. That’s hypocrisy, in case you didn’t know.
          My Reply:
          Lol! I prefer intelligent argumentation to evidence. And there’s no such thing as “proof.” However, you’ve never come close to providing anything close to evidence, and your argumentation never consisted of anything more than pitiful whining. About my never providing evidence, you can add either “really stupid,” or “liar” — or both — to “bigoted bastard” for your title. I haven’t figured out which yet.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          3. It’s not enough to compare me to Stormfront without any references from both my blog AND Stormfront.
          My Reply:
          Dude:
          • You judge people based on the color of their skin.
          • You’ve endorsed a fantasy that all white people die a violent death.
          • You’ve spoken approvingly of those who’ve advanced black supremacist hogwash. Charlatans like “Dr.” Llaila Afrika.
          • You’re a racist.
          • You’ve advanced a whole bunch of idiotic codswallop that makes vast generalizations upon hundreds of millions of men, women and children based only on the color of their skin — their “whiteness.”
          • You hang around with ugly, racist, bigoted bastards whose often bloodthirsty fantasies you endorse publicly.

          Go ahead — you tell me what’s different between you and Stormfront.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          4. No matter how you spin or reword this, you’re still defending the racist actions of teens the same way far-right people have done and are doing. How are you no different?
          My Reply:
          • Since there were no “racist actions” done by any teens, I’m obviously not defending any.
          • If far-right people also refused to defend innocent children, then they did the right thing.
          Your fabrication of racist thoughts and deeds on the part of innocent children is deeply evil. It’s disgusting, and you shuld be ashamed. You owe them a sincere apology. Not for them, for yourself. Because your current self is a polluted, twisted, ugly little thing.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          5. Have you even bothered to research what “whiteness” means as opposed to assume you know what it means or what it refers to? If not, one can only guess that you’re pushing a false agenda.
          My Reply:
          Dude: Let me point it out to you as simply as I can. If anyone were to fabricate something around, say, “black skin,” or “blackness,” people would absolutely rightly condemn all such garbage as vile, racist, ugly cr*p.

          Oh, that’s right, people did fabricate a bunch of twaddle around “black skin” and “blackness,” and it was vile, racist, ugly cr*p. And all fair-minded people rejected it, condemned it, and banished it from our midst. This notion — “whiteness” or “blackness” — that there are any conclusions you can draw merely from the color of people’s skin is… vile, racist, ugly cr*p. And really stupid. That you’re aiding and abetting the release of this same crap back into the hearts and minds of Americans is disgusting and evil. And, again, you should be ashamed. You’re probably not intelligent enough to be ashamed.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          6. You think changing words makes no difference in what the statement says? If so, it shows that you either you don’t know what racism TRULY is or that’s part of your agenda you’re pushing for your readers whom, I’m guessing, you assume will take everything you write at face value.
          My Reply:
          This was incoherent. Words do make a difference. A different word makes for a different meaning. Obviously. I know racism quite well, BrothaDuck. And it is drenched in your words, and in their meaning. If you don’t mean to be racist, then you need to go back to school and learn to write in such a way as to reflect what you really mean.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          7. Brother Duck is a new one. Makes me sound like a Disney character.
          My Reply:
          You’re about as serious as a duck.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          8. I may not be worth your anger, but you STILL take time out to reply to a racist, moronic, bigoted bastard like me. So, I’m still worth something valuable to you.
          My Reply:
          Nope. When I spend all my time in third world hellholes, fighting against serious opponents who would steal from you the right to be the moron that you are, sometimes it’s relaxing to shoot the fish in a barrel that you provide.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
          Best,

          — x

          1. 2. If there’s no such thing as “proof”, why do you scream for it so much and then shoot it down when its presented?

            3. (a.) Wrong. (b.) I apologized for that, and like a crazy person, you won’t let it go. (c.) Wrong. (d.) Wrong again. (e.) Still wrong. (f.) You don’t even know them let alone truly care about what they say. So, you’re wrong on that one too.

            I won’t tell you, because it would be a colossal waste of time. Besides, why should I seeing as how, according to your blog postings, that you never cared about the actual Stormfront enough to write how despicably racist they are. But LIKE YOU SAID ONCE, what I call ‘racist’ you call them ‘teachers’. So, by YOUR logic, Stormfront is a very educational website to you.

            4. They’re only ‘innocent’ to either those who have no clue what racism is or those who subscribe to it and see nothing wrong with it.

            5. Yes, blackness is usually referred in a negative and racist connotation. I’m well aware of that. But if you were to actually do some research, you would learn that it’s based on lies, myths and harmful stereotypes that persist to this day. Whiteness, on the other hand, describes the ideas, attitudes, actions and systems that places white people prominently or at the top and everyone else at the bottom. For black folks, it’s the very bottom most often. Whiteness is based on not just observations, research and data, but in a way, it’s a jab against the racism that invokes blackness as inferior.

            But I feel a “wrong” followed by more incorrect rebuttals coming on from you. So. I’m moving on.

            6. There are always exceptions to rules.

            7. I don’t even know what that means. You may need to stop watching the Disney Channel. Just suggesting.

            8. And yet, you’re STILL replying to my responses.

            Please say we’re done here, and insult me while doing it. Only use a different one this time.

          2. You Said:
            2. If there’s no such thing as “proof”, why do you scream for it so much and then shoot it down when its presented?
            My Reply:
            First off, you’ll probably notice that I rarely, if ever, “scream.” I tend to use a very much reasoned tone, and get emphatic only when trying to drive home a point.

            Second: I’ll accept this critique. I do ask for “proof.” I guess that would be linquistic sloppiness on my part. I mean: give me some kind of substantive evidence. By that I mean: not some off-the-beaten track blog of someone who agrees with you. Rather, produce something by established authorities, with whose work one could reasonably see how you draw your conclusions. You’ll find, however, that even the ones on the Left that you produce always support my conclusions, because my conclusions comport with… reality. Reality that even you have never disagreed with. Realities like:
            • Barack Obama elected President; then re-elected. Because of white people
            • Non-white people striving desperately to come to America; none trying to leave
            • Laws, rules, regulations, policies, procedures, practices that all favor non-white Americans.
            • Vast recourse for non-white Americans in those instances where racism, prejudice or discrimination show themselves.
            • And so on…
            These are real realities that you’ve never even once tried to deny.
            And… in your obsession over the unarmed black Americans killed by the police, I did actual research that discovered actual numbers that demonstrated clearly that the largest problem, by far facing black Americans today is violence by other black Americans. You didn’t deny the numbers, but then chastized me for not producing creative solutions to the problems… this after you had many times accused me of being a white man and telling me to butt out.
            Do you see why I call you an unserious commentator? It’s because you’re an unserious commentator. That you continue to comment, even after having been exposed as unseriuous makes you a bad person.

            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            3. (a.) Wrong. (b.) I apologized for that, and like a crazy person, you won’t let it go. (c.) Wrong. (d.) Wrong again. (e.) Still wrong. (f.) You don’t even know them let alone truly care about what they say. So, you’re wrong on that one too.
            I won’t tell you, because it would be a colossal waste of time. Besides, why should I seeing as how, according to your blog postings, that you never cared about the actual Stormfront enough to write how despicably racist they are. But LIKE YOU SAID ONCE, what I call ‘racist’ you call them ‘teachers’. So, by YOUR logic, Stormfront is a very educational website to you.
            My Reply:
            You apologized here. Meaningful, but not meaningful enough. You needed to apologize on your blog, and to repudiate the sentiment on your blog, and to call out the one who wrote it on your blog, as we would have done here. At that point, it would have been meaningful in an important way. Meaning: you’d finally be honest about your intent to repudiate the sentiment. At this point, your apology here looks more and more like just a tactic.
            Dude: don’t be a moron. I’ve never called any racists or Stormfront “teachers.” By your logic, you’re a child molester. Why? Simple you’ve never said you’re a child molester. So, ipso fact, you must be a child molester. Again, cut the crap.

            Also — do as I do, and reproduce the quote to which you’re responding, so that I — and other readers — don’t have to go back and forth to the post to see what you’re whining about. Not doing so makes your a, b, c, d, e and f above worthless.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            4. They’re only ‘innocent’ to either those who have no clue what racism is or those who subscribe to it and see nothing wrong with it.
            My Reply:
            Presumably you’re talking about the Covington High students. You’re an idiot, BW. People who didn’t commit some bad act are innocent because they… didn’t commit a bad act. Duh! The Covington High kids did nothing wrong in their confrontation with the doofus Nathan Phillips, who was the aggressor, as the video of the entire episode clearly shows. Now you’re just flailing.
            Since you’re the one who sees nothing wrong with your own racism, I presume that your last sentence is referring to yourself.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            5. Yes, blackness is usually referred in a negative and racist connotation. I’m well aware of that. But if you were to actually do some research, you would learn that it’s based on lies, myths and harmful stereotypes that persist to this day. Whiteness, on the other hand, describes the ideas, attitudes, actions and systems that places white people prominently or at the top and everyone else at the bottom. For black folks, it’s the very bottom most often. Whiteness is based on not just observations, research and data, but in a way, it’s a jab against the racism that invokes blackness as inferior.
            But I feel a “wrong” followed by more incorrect rebuttals coming on from you. So. I’m moving on.

            My Reply:
            Ummmm… except that we’ve never referred to “blackness” in people — meaning the color of their skin — in a negative way. People are, well… people. No matter the color of their skin. Period. Dude: you say the stupidest things! We’ve always said that those who tried to draw conclusions based only on the color of someone’s skin are idiots basing their conclusions on lies, myths and harmfujl stereotypes! Duh! That’s why you need to cut it out!

            You routinely and often use the term “whiteness.” If you think that descending into the gutter like other racists is somehow a positive step, then you’re even more of an idiot than I’ve been saying you are.

            “Whiteness” describes only… a color. It’s based on neither observations, research or data, but rather on prejudice, bigotry and racism. It’s not a “jab against racism,” it is racism on the part of the bigoted bastards, like you, who use the term.

            Dude: go ahead and make all the generalizations and stereotypes you want based on an entire people’s skin color, just don’t pretend it’s not racism, when it’s the very definition of racism.

            And don’t pretend you’re doing anything noble by sinking into the very same gutter you so loudly condemn. You’re a bigoted bastard, and that’s about it. Needless to say, bigoted bastards are idiots as well. Bigoted bastards are idiots when they have white skin, and bigoted bastards are idiots when they have black skin… or any other color of skin for that matter.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            6. There are always exceptions to rules.
            My Reply:
            Again, since you don’t refer back to the actual quote this is meaningless to the reader. One thing you need to do is not to make the reader have to work too hard to find your “pearls of wisdom.” Reading is best done when one can have some continuity, without having to jump around to get the meaning. Reproduce the quote to which you’re responding, or don’t respond to it.

            As to your assertion, I’ll correct it: there are often exceptions to rules.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            7. I don’t even know what that means. You may need to stop watching the Disney Channel. Just suggesting.
            My Reply:
            Again, you haven’t told me to what you’re referring. I’m going to assume that you meant the “BrothaDuck” name that you gave yourself, so I’ll respond to that. At some point, you said something like: “If it walks like a duck (a racist) and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.” Since you “quack” like a racist, that was your confession that you’re a racist, so I figured you want to be known as BrothaDuck. Would you prefer” BrothaBigotedBastard? I admit it has its pluses: the alliteration, as well as the greater, more pointed accuracy. However, since you’re kind of a ridiculous figure — out there howling for racism and pretending it’s some kind of “justice,” and all — then BrothaDuck seems potentially better. I’m mulling it over.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            8. And yet, you’re STILL replying to my responses.

            Please say we’re done here, and insult me while doing it. Only use a different one this time.

            My Reply:
            The sad thing is: Calling you a bigoted bastard is the same as calling Shaquille O’Neal tall. There’s no insult when it’s just true.
            And, yes, you may leave.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            Best,

            — x

          3. You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.

          4. Okay. Here we go…again.

            1. I don’t know that you rarely scream. I don’t know you at all outside of your blog. But the point is you ask for proof from others, but refuse to do the same when the question’s directed at you, and that makes you look like a hypocrite.

            Also, I’ve supplied evidence for you even though it was futile, because there are those like you who demands for proof to counter their arguments only to reject it flat out, and NOTHING provided is ever qualified enough to be acceptable for consideration even if it comes from accredited and empirical sources. Whether you like it or not, that’s a form of trolling and a sign of intellectual laziness and dishonesty, especially when the person provides little or no proof to support his/her own point. In the end, it shows how that the person has little or no knowledge or regard for the issue at hand.

            This is true online, or in an in-person debate. In either case, the person ends up getting owned, and in some cases, refuse to accept his/her defeat and how he/she looks ignorant or stupid after that debate, if that claim hasn’t done so already.

            This is a basic rule in ALL debates. Which is why I’m asking for proof or evidence for each one of your claims made in this latest response. Just typing it out or just saying it’s true is NOT proof, especially on the internet. Videos, links, image charts, data, etc. is what people want to see to research it for themselves and draw conclusions on their own. Some people will agree while others will disagree with some evidence of their own or will see a flaw in what you provided.

            If you don’t have anything and worse, tell others to look for the evidence themselves, that sends a red flag. It suspects that the person HAS NO proof of his/her own and is trying to hide that truth by lying. And that’s what I really think is the case here with you. I DON’T THINK you have any evidence or proof substantial enough to back up your claims. You NEVER provided any. NONE. And you just said that there’s no such thing as proof. So, technically in this matter of debate, you pretty much outed yourself as a hypocrite and a liar.

            I never argued that there’s a problem with violent crime in black neighborhoods. I made it clear from day one. But you knowingly overlook it to continue this absurd claim about me helping “black-on-black crime”, which is a racially charged term by the way.

            Basically, your argument is that since black people are committed crimes against each other, then it shouldn’t matter that police are killing us, because we’re killing ourselves. Whether you think so or not, that’s devoid of logic and compassion you supposedly have for black people. If you did, you wouldn’t tell them where they should focus their priorities on, right or wrong. You can argue how you have free speech, but you also have the capacity of what to say and what not to say, or at least you should anyway.

            2. If people are people regardless of skin color, why continue to using the words white, black and so-on? You keep saying that, but you still use words “black people” and “white people”.

            3. In one post, you said what you call ‘racist’, among other things, is what you call teachers. I referred to Charles Murray, co-author of the infamous “Bell Curve” a racist based on how the book helped re-energizes scientific racism in the 1990’s, and it’s still the holy grail for a lot of white supremacists and white nationalists.

            YOU PRAISED HIM. So, that means you’ve heard of him and/or what he’s written. And you CANNOT refute that he helped write that book or what that book discusses. So, how you can say you’re not racist and yet, you SUPPORT someone who ACTUALLY IS? After all, YOU DID blame black “racists” for white nationalism which is perhaps honestly the DUMBEST thing I’ve ever read that only shifts blame away from an actual problem from what you and other conservatives THINK is a problem.

            Bottom line, you don’t like to be called racist, BUT you don’t mind liking them, supporting them or sounding like them.

            4. I explained the differences in the way “blackness” and “whiteness” are used, and here you are calling it stupid, which means you reject counter information based on what you THINK is correct information supported by…NOTHING.

            I tell you that whiteness is more than just skin color and that it’s a wide range of factors like behaviors, institutions, etc. You say it’s just skin color and called me a bigoted bastard for the hundredth time.

            If you think racism all comes down to hating someone based on skin color, you need to find a dictionary and re-read the definition. Calling me names and calling what I say stupid doesn’t make you smarter. Racism is based on the socially constructed caste system based on pseudo-science, like the kind your idol Charles Murray believes in, in which one race is believed to be superior to all others and said race creates a society where that race AND ONLY THAT RACE at the top of social, economic and political structures. However, even though nonwhites broke barriers and overcame adversity to inherit some power, most of it is still largely held by whites.

            In my opinion, only someone with a grade school education would EVER think that racism is simply about hating others for skin color or that my criticism of white racism is racist itself and refer to me as a bigoted bastard numerous times as if it has any intellectual merit.

            In the end, what you call racism is really black people calling out white racism. The former is what you concentrate mostly as you see it as a “bigger” problem than white racism. I go by your blog and see that you largely believe that racism is in the hands of blacks, or at least that’s what you want your readers to think no matter what, evidence or not.

            If I or black people in general have to tirelessly defend ourselves to someone who keeps telling them they’re wrong, what’s the point in trying to converse?

            I hear the similar claims from admitted white racists, white supremacists, white nationalists, alt-right, etc. You don’t want to be lumped in with such crowds, but you repeat their talking points. Honestly, what makes you think you’re any different?

            5. Okay, tell Shaq he’s call, and take a picture of the expression on his face. I doubt you will. You prefer to behave like this behind a computer to avoid any confrontations. Real brave of you.

            In the end, my friend, you have a funny meaning for the word “true”.

          5. You Said:
            Okay. Here we go…again.
            My Reply:
            Ok.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            1. I don’t know that you rarely scream. I don’t know you at all outside of your blog. But the point is you ask for proof from others, but refuse to do the same when the question’s directed at you, and that makes you look like a hypocrite.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            Also, I’ve supplied evidence for you even though it was futile, because there are those like you who demands for proof to counter their arguments only to reject it flat out, and NOTHING provided is ever qualified enough to be acceptable for consideration even if it comes from accredited and empirical sources. Whether you like it or not, that’s a form of trolling and a sign of intellectual laziness and dishonesty, especially when the person provides little or no proof to support his/her own point. In the end, it shows how that the person has little or no knowledge or regard for the issue at hand.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You Said:

            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            This is true online, or in an in-person debate. In either case, the person ends up getting owned, and in some cases, refuse to accept his/her defeat and how he/she looks ignorant or stupid after that debate, if that claim hasn’t done so already.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling, illiterate crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            This is a basic rule in ALL debates. Which is why I’m asking for proof or evidence for each one of your claims made in this latest response. Just typing it out or just saying it’s true is NOT proof, especially on the internet. Videos, links, image charts, data, etc. is what people want to see to research it for themselves and draw conclusions on their own. Some people will agree while others will disagree with some evidence of their own or will see a flaw in what you provided.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            If you don’t have anything and worse, tell others to look for the evidence themselves, that sends a red flag. It suspects that the person HAS NO proof of his/her own and is trying to hide that truth by lying. And that’s what I really think is the case here with you. I DON’T THINK you have any evidence or proof substantial enough to back up your claims. You NEVER provided any. NONE. And you just said that there’s no such thing as proof. So, technically in this matter of debate, you pretty much outed yourself as a hypocrite and a liar.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            I never argued that there’s a problem with violent crime in black neighborhoods. I made it clear from day one. But you knowingly overlook it to continue this absurd claim about me helping “black-on-black crime”, which is a racially charged term by the way.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            Basically, your argument is that since black people are committed crimes against each other, then it shouldn’t matter that police are killing us, because we’re killing ourselves. Whether you think so or not, that’s devoid of logic and compassion you supposedly have for black people. If you did, you wouldn’t tell them where they should focus their priorities on, right or wrong. You can argue how you have free speech, but you also have the capacity of what to say and what not to say, or at least you should anyway.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            2. If people are people regardless of skin color, why continue to using the words white, black and so-on? You keep saying that, but you still use words “black people” and “white people”.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            3. In one post, you said what you call ‘racist’, among other things, is what you call teachers. I referred to Charles Murray, co-author of the infamous “Bell Curve” a racist based on how the book helped re-energizes scientific racism in the 1990’s, and it’s still the holy grail for a lot of white supremacists and white nationalists.

            YOU PRAISED HIM. So, that means you’ve heard of him and/or what he’s written. And you CANNOT refute that he helped write that book or what that book discusses. So, how you can say you’re not racist and yet, you SUPPORT someone who ACTUALLY IS? After all, YOU DID blame black “racists” for white nationalism which is perhaps honestly the DUMBEST thing I’ve ever read that only shifts blame away from an actual problem from what you and other conservatives THINK is a problem.

            Bottom line, you don’t like to be called racist, BUT you don’t mind liking them, supporting them or sounding like them.

            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            4. I explained the differences in the way “blackness” and “whiteness” are used, and here you are calling it stupid, which means you reject counter information based on what you THINK is correct information supported by…NOTHING.

            I tell you that whiteness is more than just skin color and that it’s a wide range of factors like behaviors, institutions, etc. You say it’s just skin color and called me a bigoted bastard for the hundredth time.

            If you think racism all comes down to hating someone based on skin color, you need to find a dictionary and re-read the definition. Calling me names and calling what I say stupid doesn’t make you smarter. Racism is based on the socially constructed caste system based on pseudo-science, like the kind your idol Charles Murray believes in, in which one race is believed to be superior to all others and said race creates a society where that race AND ONLY THAT RACE at the top of social, economic and political structures. However, even though nonwhites broke barriers and overcame adversity to inherit some power, most of it is still largely held by whites.

            In my opinion, only someone with a grade school education would EVER think that racism is simply about hating others for skin color or that my criticism of white racism is racist itself and refer to me as a bigoted bastard numerous times as if it has any intellectual merit.

            In the end, what you call racism is really black people calling out white racism. The former is what you concentrate mostly as you see it as a “bigger” problem than white racism. I go by your blog and see that you largely believe that racism is in the hands of blacks, or at least that’s what you want your readers to think no matter what, evidence or not.

            If I or black people in general have to tirelessly defend ourselves to someone who keeps telling them they’re wrong, what’s the point in trying to converse?

            I hear the similar claims from admitted white racists, white supremacists, white nationalists, alt-right, etc. You don’t want to be lumped in with such crowds, but you repeat their talking points. Honestly, what makes you think you’re any different?

            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            You Said:
            5. Okay, tell Shaq he’s call, and take a picture of the expression on his face. I doubt you will. You prefer to behave like this behind a computer to avoid any confrontations. Real brave of you.

            In the end, my friend, you have a funny meaning for the word “true”.
            My Reply:
            You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            Bottom line: Since you’ve now admitted that you’re a liar, you’ve confirmed my contention that I don’t need to take anything you write seriously. So I won’t.

            Best,

            — x

          6. 1. Okay. But you’ll still pointlessly respond to them regardless. (That’s my reply to your replies in this entry.)

            2. See number 1.

            3. See number 2.

            4. See number 3.

            5. See number 4.

            BOTTOM LINE: You NEVER took ANYTHING I’ve written seriously. So, what’s the big loss?

          7. You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.

          8. First: You never wrote anything serious.

            Second: what you write is racist, fascistic, toxic, stupid, and needed to be countered.

            Why? Easy: because you’re a bigoted bastard.

            Best,

            — x

          9. Okay, im going to go since you can’t think of any other names to call me, you believing you’re a humble, compassionate, caring, humane intellectual and all.

          10. Okay. Yes, I like to think I’m a humble, compassionate, caring, humane person.

            I don’t need to think of other names for you. I settled on the one that I figure is true. So, it’s not a “name” if it’s true, now is it?

            Best,

            — x

          11. Again, you’d have no way of knowing. Besides you’re a confessed troll, so there’s nothing in your responses that we can trust.

            Besides, you’re a leftist, who supports leftist policies in cities… policies that kill black people, so you have a lot of nerve telling me that I’m not compassionate, you who help kill black people.

            Best,

            — x

          12. You keep saying that leftist policies kill black people. How, exactly?

            For the record, I don’t consider myself a leftist or a liberal in an absolute sense.

            Finally, you saying that I help kill black people is pure nonsense and immoral, and is unworthy of a response.

          13. You are a leftist. You’re not a liberal. You do help kill black people.

            The Left has owned the cities lock, stock and barrel for three generations, and they’re killing fields for black folks

            Someone, somewhere should suggest that you — freakin’ throw the Democrats out? No? Hello? Anyone home? Or are you really as stupid as you seem in blog posts?

            Stop being a moron.

            Best,

            — x

          14. Okay. Where’s the information you plucked this from about Democrats. Also, since you despise the left and Democrats SO MUCH as you’ve made plain since day one, what you’re saying is that you want a one-parry system to be in charge. In other words, you love it if the right was the ONLY party in America?

            Right or wrong?

          15. But you still want a right wing nation, and no, it’s not obvious as all of your posts about the left are anti-left.

            Try again.

          16. There’s no such thing as a “right-wing nation.”

            Stop telling me what I think and want.

            Never do it again. Idiot.

            I’d point out to you that if your assertion is valid, then I could say the same about you, only using the right.

            Stop saying things about me that I could simply say about you. It advances nothing, and it’s just trolling.

            Best,

            — x

          17. You know, just like you tell me to proofread, I’ll tell you to re-read and comprehend.

            I said that you WANT a right wing nation. Read carefully next time, please.

            By the way, you telling me to stop doing what you’re accusing me of doing is NOT the same as objecting. Besides, with the way you clap back, all I’ll get is you calling me names, telling me I’m wrong and repeating yourself with no references.

            At this point, I honestly think that everything you say is real and true is only according to what you think of in your head and for some reason, you think it holds more weight than actual truth and reality.

            Proof me wrong if I am.

            I’m not saying anything that you haven’t brought on yourself. You’re in love with the right and conservatism to where you’re lightly kissing fascism. That’s all I’m saying.

          18. Then, you’d better re-read. You’ll note that I took that opportunity to response to another post. It says so right there in the post. Read carefully next time, please.

            If I’m “lightly kissing fascism,” a left-wing political tendency, then you’re suggesting that I have some fondness for your thinking. I don’t.

            Remember, you’re the one silencing those who disagree with you, then slandering them, calling them ridiculous names, whining about how they express themselves. Dude: that wussy crap is the fascist way, and I want nothing to do with it.

            Nothing is farther away from fascism than the Right and Conservatism. The main principle of Conservatism is: less government control over the people. There’s no governing philosophy further from Fascism than that.

            Since you’re a leftist, you’re a proto-fascist.

            Best,

            — x

          19. You Said:
            Are you, as they say in England, daft?
            My Reply:
            No.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You Said:
            I never mentioned anything about whether fascism is left or right. I simply meant that you’re itching to want a one-party system. The term is not as simple as you want to make it, but all in all, your loyalty to the right and disdain for the left shows that you have no use for compromises from them and that a right wing government is what you desire.
            My Reply:
            HYou equate fascism with the Right. You were wrong.
            As wrong as you were to do that, this is not one of your usual ridiculously stupid replies. What’s going on here? Serious question: are you having someone else write them for you?

            I have disdain for the Left because they’re idiots… and harmful, hateful, racist, ugly idiots at that. It would be irresponsible not to have disdain for such people. My loyalty is not to the Right at all, but to Conservative ideals. Since the Right is the current home of those ideals, then I am allied with the right. That alliance will last for exactly as long as the Right adheres to the right (correct) ideals. If, for example, tomorrow the Democrat Pasrty — the politcal mouthpiece of the Left — were to embrace small government, pro-life, strong national defense, loyalty to the Constitution, and other things that I support, then I’d be singing the praises of the Democrawt Party. However, here’s the deal: the Democrat Party leadership is hopelessly corrupt. One hundred percent. And getting worse. The Republican Party os 50% corrupt. And getting worse. Conservatism, however remains completely uncorrupted (because it’s a set of ideas and ideals, os it can’t be corrupt.) and real Conservatives remain, by far, the least corrupt people in the political landscape of the country.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You Said:
            I’m well aware of what conservatism asks. It asks for small government. But that seems to be the case whenever liberals and the left have much of the power. No conservative says the same thing when the right and conservatives have most of the power.
            My Reply:
            Again, this is not one of your usual pathetically stupid replies! Answer me honestly: did you really write it? What you said is almost correct! What happens is that Republicans run on intelligent, commonsensical, Conservative ideas and get elected, and then abaondon those excellent Conservative ideas once they get to Washington. The reason they do that is because they hear this steady drumbeat of how they must be “bi-partisan,” and they must “learn to compromise,” or else they’re “extremists,” and “ideologues.” It’s a bunch of hogwash, but they believe it. The problem is that there should be no compromise with the hoplessly corrupt Democrats. Why? Because the Democrats are hopelessly corrupt. A genuine Conservative should never, ever, not ever compromise with the evil that comes from the Democrat Party… but the end up doing it. The media are incredibly poserful, and many a good Conservative has been ruined in Washington by them, and has abandoned the thoughts and ideas on which he ran, and which got him elected… and has become noting more than someone willing to compromise with the Left, who is out to ruin this country.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You Said:
            Understandable, but still hypocritical.
            My Reply:
            No. Now that you have the explanation, you can disabuse yourself of this notion. However, let’s state it a bit more simply. There are no Rightists supporting big government, because big government is a leftist thing. If a Republican supports bigger government, then he’s distancing himself from the Right and moving to the Left. At some point in that process he becomes simply a leftist Republican.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

            Best,

            — x

          20. Okay.

            But at some point in your life, you’re going to have to learn that what you say isn’t always enough or even acceptable. It’s what you mean. It’s what you’re implying. If you can’t deal with that, maybe you should stop blogging.

            Just a suggestion seeing as how it reads like you’re tired of all this.

          21. Dude: I say what I mean. You don’t get to pretend I’m saying something else. Sorry.

            That coming from you — an admitted liar and troll — is funny.

            I’m not tired of all this. I type ferociously fast, so it takes me only a minute or two to dash off a lengthy reply.

            I’m tired of you. I’m never tired of writing.

            Best,

            — x

          22. I, on the other hand, do get to tell you that you’re saying something else because of all the hundreds of times you’ve done it to me .

            I think I mentioned before that I’ve taken off the gloves?

            You cheated, lied, whined. trolled, mind-read, lied some more, mind-read some more, insulted, whined some more, degraded, sneered, name-called, lied some more, sniveled, trolled some more, and otherwise were crap in your replies, until finally I (we) had put up with it enough.

            So, yes, if I’m taking liberties with my (our) own rules, too bad. I’ve (we’ve) told you hundreds of times to straighten up, fly right, answer the questions, address the real issues, and you never did it. So now I’m (we’re) done. Quit your whining.

            Best,

            — x

          23. Lol! Of course you won’t be a Conservative. You’re too much of an idiot. You have to have something going on between your ears to be a Conservative, and you don’t. I realized that recently, and that’s the reason for my new tone.

            Previous to this, it had nothing to do with my tone, because I was always polite to you, even and especially when you didn’t deserve it, which was always.

            You simply didn’t like the fact that you can’t think of anything #1 to use to paint me as a racist, and #2, you keep getting your sorry backside shellacked in debate.

            You hate that, because you never grew up, and you’re just a big sniveling crybaby.

            You haven’t seen crap from the alt-this or the alt-that, because that would imply that you know what those things are, and you don’t, because you’re too intellectually lazy to find out what they are.

            You don’t know anything about race relations in America, you don’t know about police shootings, you’re a puppet for puppet-masters who do your thinking for you, you hate black people, because you help kill them.

            Nope, you won’t be a Conservative… you’re too stupid.

            Now, go whine to your babysitter, because it’s time for your bottle. Plus, I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a big load of poo-poo in your diaper, because there’s a pile of it between your ears.

            Best,

            — x

        1. You Said:
          Oh! And FYI, I’m not mad at you either. You don’t make me mad anymore, and your words no longer offend me, because, honestly, I have right on my side, I adhere to facts and not simply beliefs which are two different things. And frankly, the way you debate is beneath me in a mature sense and on an intellectual level.
          My Reply:
          Finally!

          Does this mean you’re finally going to stop all that pitiful whining about how mean and rude I am?!? Wow! All I can say is, it’s just about time!!!!

          Oh, and what, really, is beneath a Stormfront bigoted bastard like you? I can’t think of anything.

          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –

          You Said:
          So, you might ask why I came back, and why I keep doing this. It’s simple. Someone has to.
          My Reply:
          I don’t care.
          – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
          Best,

          — x

          1. Wow! Again: ’bout time!

            You’ll notice that I finally got you to stop whining by simply stooping to your level and calling you names.

            You’re nothing if not easy to move around. Like a sheep. That’s why you still have the stupid notions in your head that you have.

            “Bastard” is not a curse word. It’s a mildly crude word, whose literal meaning is one whose parents were not married when he was born.

            I probably wouldn’t allow you to use it, because you show no other self-control. On our side, however, we try to consider each word we use carefully, so that — as you can see above — we’re able to use occasionally strong language to achieve a desirable end: in this case to get you to stop whining.

            You were always sniveling about how we were “calling you names,” when we weren’t. So I decided to actually call you names, and you fell for it, and came ’round right to where I wanted you, which was to stop whining about the tone of our posts.

            Best,

            — x

          2. You said:
            Let’s get this straight.
            My Reply:
            Oh, you’re a homophobe too!

            Let’s get this straight” is coded talk for anti-gay sentiments. You should be ashamed of yourself, you bigoted bastard.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You said:
            You DIDN’T make me do anything. I did this on MY OWN for MYSELF.
            My Reply:
            Okay. But you did it in response to my change of tone. So I’m taking credit. Credit for taming the shrew! Sorry, for taming the sheep.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You said:
            As for whining, maybe that’s what you THINK I was doing, because from what I’ve learned from observing how people on the right act, I’ve learned that they draw conclusions based on faith and beliefs and the less knowledge, the better. And they believe being offensive and even cruel is the way to come out on top.
            My Reply:
            Dude: you were all, “You’re so ruuuuude! Waaaaaaaahhhh!!!” You were doing some serious whining!

            How funny that a Leftist who’s lost every argument he’s ever had with me because he was so much less informed than I, lectures me about arguing from “faith and beliefs!” All the things I’ve had to teach you, and you pretend that you’ve been arguing from “knowledge?!?” Lol! You’re dong comedy now, BBB!
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            You said:
            It’s sad to say this, but that describes a lot of today’s conservatives, including you.
            My Reply:
            You do know that all studies ever done show that (1) the Left is less informed, (2) less educated, (3) less knowledgeable, (4) less able to do critical thinking. Know why? Because they’re, on average, younger! Younger people know less stuff. The really pathetic leftists are the older ones — like you — who’ve had more than enough time to learn, but just haven’t.
            – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * – * –
            Best,

            — x

          3. You’re the one who used the code words for anti-gay sentiment. You’re a great leftist, because leftists are always everything they so loudly condemn.

            And you’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.

    1. Oh, and I (we) delete no comments.

      Ever.

      Only people like you do that to try to promote the lie that there are not people who disagree with your bigoted views.

      We engage in no censorship whatsoever here, because we’re not insecure in our beliefs.

      If your comment doesn’t appear, it’s because you used some intemperate language and I haven’t yet cleaned up the language to let it through for publication.

      Best,

      — x

    2. Lol! You got so much wrong in here too!

      • Of course you’re not afraid of me! I’m no threat to you at all! I’ve never been violent in my life!
      • You are, however, terrified of my views.
      • You are a racist bastard, so why wouldn’t I post such a truth?
      • I, of course, am not a racist, so I don’t mind being called a racist even a tiny bit. However, I will correct the record. That seems perfectly appropriate.

      Best,

      — x

        1. Yep. You are.

          You’re terrified of potentially losing the free stuff you get, and of losing your exalted victim status.

          Heck, you’re probably worried about having to go out and earn an honest living, using real, marketable skills like other people have to do.

          You’re afraid of losing your easy free ride.

          Best,

          — x

          1. Free stuff? Where can you go to get free stuff? And what kind of stuff do you get? Is it new socks? I could really need some? Or better yet, is it a new car like on a game show?

            😄

          2. You’re a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.

          3. In any case, you don’t know what happened…with this thread.

            Do you realize that we’re NO LONGER talking about the incident and that we’re SO FAR OFF-TOPIC that the focus is on me and how I’m such a bigoted bastard?

            I effectively derailed your topic. So, basically I TROLLED THE TROLL. And yet, I’m the idiot here. LOL

          4. And now you admit to being a troll!

            That makes you a racist, homophobic, sexist troll!!

            And all by your own admission!

            Well. I knew you were unserious, but now that you’ve confessed it!

            I always operate under the basic assumption that people are arguing in good faith, but not when they admit openly that they’re not.

            So now we enter into Phase III of our interaction. I guess you showed me! You were the troll! I was trusting you and you betrayed that trust. I thought you were being honest, but now you’ve admitted that you’re nothing but a racist, lying bastard of a troll.

            Are you this manipulative and dishonest to everyone, or only those who trounce you in internet debates?

            Let’s give you a new name: How about: BrothaBigotedBastardHomophobeSexistLyingTroll? What do you think of it? It even has a nice little shortcut: BBBHSLT.

            I like it. I could throw “Idiot” in there as well: BrothaBigotedBastardHomophobeSexistIdiotLyingTroll — or: BBBSHLIT.

            Oops! That’s close to a forbidden bad word… you know, one like what you used to call me all the time? That you never apologized for? Because you’re an ill-mannered lout too? That one.

            Best,

            — x

          5. You DON’T argue in good faith. In fact, you argue in DEPLORABLE FAITH all the time.

            And just because I was trolling you this time doesn’t mean I wasn’t telling the truth the whole time. I was just giving you a taste of your own medicine.

            And look, we’re still OFF-TOPIC, because you’re still riding me.

          6. Nope. You’re a self-confessed liar, which throws everything you ever said into doubt.

            Furthermore, you’re also a self-confessed troll, which means that none of your responses can be trusted to be anything but dishonest, unserious, ill-informed, ignorant, trolling crap… as is the above.

    1. Nope. I see people. You see only skin color. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you STILL see the Covington High kids as wrong in the incident. Sorry… you’re a racist.

      Best,

      — x

      1. You called some liberals BLACK liberals and racists BLACK racists. Also, you expressed your admiration for WHITE men in a recent blog. Just a reminder, black and white are COLORS.

        1. Yep. I add the modifier if the identification is not clear without it.

          In America today, when the word “racist” is used, due to the perversity of the times, it’s come to mean, without being said, a white person.

          If I use the term “black racist,” it’s to be sure that I’m talking about, well, about a black racist. If I need to make that distinction when referring to a white racist, I do it.

          I refer to white racists and white racism all the time.

          When I refer to “racists” without the qualifier, usually I’m speaking of white racists, because that’s how society understands the term.

          I expressed my admiration for white men, because they’re the most productive, generous, altruistic group on the planet. They have gobs and gobs and gobs and gobs to admire, so I expressed my admiration for them.

          I’ve done that for black men, white women, black women, and men, and women of all manner of ethnicities and backgrounds as well.

          I made a special case for admiration for white men, because that’s the group that everyone likes to pretend, erroneously, is the focus of all evil on the planet.

          And when I referred — generally disparagingly — to “Black liberals,” I disparaged their leftism not their blackness. I always, no exceptions, made sure to make that distinction, because I know there are idiots out there reading these things.

          Best,

          — x

          1. In reality that’s an idiotic thing to say.

            Of course, I see color and sex. I know whether a person’s black, brown, white, man, woman, child, tall, short… just by looking at them. Like anyone else.

            I just don’t judge based on any of those things.

            That’s the difference between a racist and me. You do judge based on those things.

            You’re a racist.

            I’m not.

            Best,

            — x

          2. But you can’t say you don’t see color and then say you do. You can’t have it both ways. Also, I’ve said that it’s the ACTIONS that matter and NOT the color about a thousand times, you made a choice not to accept it and chose to judge me on what you THINK I am despite me explaining myself.

            So yes, YOU judge as well.

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s