The California branch of the Democrat Party failed to endorse far-leftist sitting Senator Dianne Feinstein for a sixth term in the U.S. Senate. Feinstein’s problem? She was an irrational half-wit only 95% of the time(1), and you can’t be acceptable in today’s Democrat Party — especially the California edition of that corrupt, crapulent assemblage — unless you’re an irrational half-wit at least 98% of the time.
You can make sense 2% of the time because you have to run for re-election, and you can’t deceive the electorate if you’re saying what you really think and believe.
California Democrats endorsed no one for this go round, but that’s because a primary candidate whom the media described as “liberal” was in the race.
Well, if the media are describing someone as “liberal,” you can bet your last dollar that means the dude would make Trotsky look like Ronald Reagan.
It’s not known, yet, whom California Democrats will endorse in the general election, but it’s a sure thing that the candidate will be a half-wit. It’s just a question of which half-wit… the established 95% half-wit, Feinstein, or another 98%’er half-wit way far to the left of her.
That’s our Democrat Party of today… You have your choice, as long as you’re okay with near total idiots, total idiots, almost full-on morons, complete morons, complete clodpoles, almost total blockheads, thorough-going chuckleheads, low-octane dopes, dim-bulbs, fat-heads, boneheaded birdbrains, dolts or chumps.
If you’re looking for actual brains you’ll have to turn right, and travel quite a ways.
One thing’s for absolutely certain: Never, ever, not ever, not in a million years should you expect any branch of the Democrat Party to pick a successor to a sitting Senator, Congressman, President, Assemblyperson, Mayor, Governor, Librarian or Dogcatcher who’s superior to his or her predecessor.
(1) She’s not a complete nitwit when she talks about foreign policy.