Talking Turkey: Transgender


I spend a good deal of my time dodging projectiles hurled with churlish intent. It can crystallize the vision.

Can someone tell me, please, where I go wrong with the following:

  • John (not his real name) comes up to me and tells me that he’s a woman.
  • I know John, and from having been his teammate in baseball, I know that he possesses the usual set of male reproductive equipment.
  • John has a deep voice, a man’s beard, and the general form of a man: narrower hips, wider shoulders, Adam’s apple, etc.
  • I presume that John has a chemical mix in his body that would be typical of a man. They’re different, you know — the chemical mix of a woman from that of a man. Measurably different.
  • Furthermore, John has four children(!), all produced in the usual way, and for each of whom, John donated the male DNA package necessary to produce said children.
  • Yet, there’s John, looking me in the eye, and insisting he’s really a woman.
  • I look at John and, because I’m public scenes-averse, I merely nod, and mumble something noncommittal, like “Mmm hmmm.”(1)

But wait… there’s more.

  • Now the media take up John’s story and blast it throughout the land. They call John “she” and say that they’re telling “her” story, as if it is a proven conclusion that John, the father of four is, actually, a woman.
  • Still more bizarrely, if you (or I, of course), express any skepticism whatsoever about this notion of John’s, you or I are bigots, and cruel, retrograde … ignorant louts, deserving of all the scorn, and derision normally reserved for such as the Ku Klux Klan, and segregationists, and Jim Crow supporters, and other offshoots of Hillary Clinton’s Democrat Party(2).

Now, to the notion that I have. I wonder whether you can find some way to disabuse me of it:

Is there anything at all — besides John’s insistence — to indicate that John is a woman? Anything?(3)

You might note that I put forward some rather persuasive evidence that, despite his apparently sincere insistence, John’s really a man. To wit:

  • Male equipment
  • Narrower hips
  • Wider shoulders
  • Adam’s apple
  •  Deep voice
  • Chemical mix
  • Oh, and four kids produced in the usual way.
  • One more quick thing — a brief thought experiment: Let’s hypothesize that immediately after John tells me all this, he’s struck by a bolt of lightning and dies, leaving me as the only one ever to hear his newly-revealed thoughts. What sex would the coroner circle on the death certificate, and how certain would that coroner be of his conclusion?(4)

So, with all that, what is John — a man or a woman? More to the point: why, if we greet John’s revelation with skepticism, are you and/or I, bigots, and retrograde, ignorant louts?

Just between you ‘n me and the lamppost, John sounds … confused.

It happens, ya know.

Confusion makes people say the oddest things. And, I defy you to tell me something more confusing than … sex. Look: anyone who’s not confused by sex is just not normal. Anyone who’s not confused by simple man-woman relations isn’t normal!

Some intriguing side thoughts: there are Americans out in the world, who are in a whole lot more danger than anything I might encounter. Americans who risk life and limb, each moment of each day, so that people like John can, in the luxury of their calm, quiet home, agonize over the odd contradiction between that thing dangling between their legs and their wacky, out-in-left-field maundering that they might really be a woman.

I’m 6’4″ tall; do I get to claim to be a short dude? Does that mere claim make it true? If you look at me and call hogwash on me, does that make of you a bigot and a lout?

What if I claim to be — identify as– a billionaire? Are you a retrograde, ignorant nincompoop if you don’t treat me like one?

As I said, there are things that can crystallize the vision.

So, just one more time, ’cause I’d really like to know whether there actually does exist such a thing:

Is there anything at all — besides John’s insistence — to indicate that John is a woman? Anything?

— xPraetorius

Notes:


(1) Instead of the — “Are you OUT OF YOUR FREAKIN’ MIND?!?” — that I rightly should have done. 🙂

(2) Yep. All were groups, or policies. laws or regulations formed or promulgated by the American Democrat Party.

(3) Science? Plainly not biology. Here, plainly, is where two sciences are at loggerheads: Biology and Psychology. Why is Psychology the winner in this conflict? Biology deals with facts, and measurements, and the like; Psychology is all — 100% — theory. Yep. I come from a family of psychologists. They all freely admit it. It’s all theory. Why would a science that’s 100% theory carry the day over a science concerned only with facts and knowable, measurable things?

(4) This story is, with enough camouflage to protect the identities of the principals, true. The bolt of lighting is, thank goodness, hypothetical, but John’s four kids are real, and are friends of mine.

 

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Talking Turkey: Transgender

  1. John is also hard-wired in his brain, AND designed in his heart–his mind and emotions, a MALE. Advocates of transgenderism want us to buy that sex/gender is so superficial that it’s nothing at all to change it, and it can be fluid; and at the same time that to deny someone his or her intrinsic self-proclaimed sex/gender nature is the worst of evils. Is it skin deep or fundamental essence? They must contradict themselves.

    I’ve never seen this item engaged: how is it even possible for a person to identify as the other thing when they have not experienced what it is to be the other thing, cannot ever experience being the other thing, while they are still entirely the thing they are?
    It’s very clear that men who ID as women are actually ID ing as some TV sitcom caricature of a woman. They have no earthly idea what it is to be female at all.

  2. Thanks for your extremely well-stated comment, MB!

    You said:

    I’ve never seen this item engaged: how is it even possible for a person to identify as the other thing when they have not experienced what it is to be the other thing, cannot ever experience being the other thing, while they are still entirely the thing they are?
    It’s very clear that men who ID as women are actually ID ing as some TV sitcom caricature of a woman. They have no earthly idea what it is to be female at all.

    We did write up something on this topic. It’s here. Here’s the relevant quote from the piece:

    ◾Why aren’t the feminists really ticked off that a man would claim to know enough about what it is to be a woman in order to claim to be a woman? Seriously. Where did he come up with this impressive inside knowledge that, feminists will insist, no normal man could possibly know? I know the answer to this question, by the way: The LGBTQIAAP movement is even more vicious than the feminists. All Americans cower before the wrath of the pink-ribbon-rainbow-light-loafers crowd, especially feminists.

    Some of us are asking the painfully obvious questions that the dominant media are, apparently, too stupid or cowardly to ask.

    One would think that the feminists at least would be outraged at the preposterous supposition that any biological man could possibly know what it is to be a woman, so that he could say that he identifies as one. In this — if only this — instance, they’d be right.

    Yet the feminists have been as deafeningly silent on the transgender nonsense, as they’ve been ear-shatteringly shrill on everything else!

    You will note, of course, that my own identification as a billionaire has fallen on deaf ears. What a bunch of reactionary, ignorant bigots! 🙂

    Best,

    — x

    1. Exactly! I am most definitely not a feminist, but I am personally offended at men who claim to identify as women. Dudes have no idea about being a female.
      I don’t wear heavy make-up, I don’t talk with a lisp, I don’t swish around, I don’t talk about sex and hair and nails. I guess I’m not a woman.

      No, I just conduct a happy marriage in partnership with my husband, I bore six children, and I find my fulfillment in creating and maintaining a home for my family. Even these are only the outward things. These men have no clue about intrinsic qualities that are part of the essence of being female.

  3. The hubris of declaring one’s gender to be different than what it is strikes me as the logical furthest extension of a human-centered worldview.
    It is beyond rebellion and cosmic denial. It is to tell God “I will put my own biology on the line to say you created me wrong – and I will do it MY way instead”.

    As you point out above: such people are very, very confused and need salvation. Good luck preaching the transgender message outside of decadent North America and Western Europe. Africa, Asia and the Latin World laugh with scorn as we assent to such idiocy.

    1. So well said, Andrew!

      Thank you especially for this: “It is beyond rebellion and cosmic denial. It is to tell God ‘I will put my own biology on the line to say you created me wrong – and I will do it MY way instead’.”

      I have a belief: that God’s truth works on all levels: the moral, legal, philosophical, intellectual, practical. However, I tend to write from a secular point of view, because this is not a faith-focused blog. Though, we do write about faith when the opportunity presents itself. 🙂

      I deeply appreciate it when people such as you remind me of the real reason we should do anything and everything: to give glory, worship and adoration to God.

      Best,

      — x

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s