Hilarious Exchange with the RGI

As you all know pretty well, I spend some time last year duking it out with some of the pawns of the Race Grievance Industry. These people are the stooges who take to the airwaves, social media, publications, the blogs and the street, with all sorts of frothing imprecations and lunatic accusations of racism, all at the command of their leadership.

I went at it with them for some months last year and the previous year, before they tacitly admitted they were out of gas, and, indirectly at least, conceded defeat. How, you might ask? By banning me from their pages.

I was nearly unfailingly polite, but I was firm, logical, backed up what I said, and they had nothing to counter it except to cry racism and run away, tails between legs.

Well, since my banishment, I’ve continued to follow some of their blogs — here are two of them: Brotha Wolf and Abagond — because the topic of race relations has always been of great interest to me. There have been some interesting posts, generally by insightful respondents to typically mediocre or boilerplate posts by the owners of the blogs.

However that all changed today. What appears to be shaping up as an interesting exchange is happening there now! Brotha Wolf — aka Brotha Cryin’ Wolf — had a typically stupid post. It’s here.

In it, BW thinks he has caught Bill O’Reilly in a gotcha moment, when O’Reilly — à la Brian Williams — supposedly lied about his whereabouts during the Falklands War in order to make it seem as if he were in the thick of battle. The problem is that someone immediately came forward and corroborated O’Reilly’s story. Furthermore, there seems to be no hint of anything else like that in O’Reilly’s past, while Williams appears to have been a serial exaggerator.

Let’s face it, the left are all serial exaggerators. Aka: liars.

But, wait! The first response to Brotha Wolf’s dumb post was from a commentator calling himself “SnowMan.” He (presumably a “he”(1)) simply eviscerated Brotha Cryin’ Wolf’s premise. To his credit, the good Brotha didn’t immediately ban SnowMan, but rather tried to engage him. That was probably a mistake, as BW was plainly over-matched. Another of BW’s acolytes, the brainless Herneith joined in as well. She has one speed with people who disagree with her: racism! She was true to form, but SnowMan wiped her out in the very next post. It was a delicious little exchange. I’ve reproduced it below, [with Editor’s Notes in red and square brackets] because I wonder whether Brotha Wolf will leave the embarrassing exchange up for long.

Typically Brotha Wolf bans people who get too uppity in their disagreement with him, and SnowMan is nothing if not uppity! However, if he’s allowed to stay around for a while, the fireworks ought to be fun to watch! I’m thinking I’d like to recruit SnowMan to contribute to our blog, but I suspect he has his own.

Again, here’s the link. Enjoy!

The blog thread is below:


When Conservatives Face the Music

This Bill O’Reilly scandal, and that’s what it is naysayers, has gotten worse and worse for the conservative commentator. In fact, you know it’s gotten bad when even your fellow conservatives call you out on your lies. After Brian Williams got caught in a fib, O’Reilly saw fit to scold him. And then, you know what happened after that. It was all downhill for the man who loved pointing fingers at the world, but too full of himself, along with something else, to admit his own flaws, one of them being that he’s apparently a pathological liar.

Now, it seems that conservatives, for the most part, are trying to distance themselves from the mess that is Bill O’Reilly, especially when he’s going around threatening those who had the balls to call him out. MSN reports:

The editors in chief at Mother Jones this morning sent this email/letter to Fox News Channel’s primetime star Bill O’Reilly and one of the network’s communications execs, saying it is concerned for its Washington bureau chief’s safety after O’Reilly called for him to be “in the kill zone.”

“Mother Jones writer David Corn yesterday responded to Bill O’Reilly’s comments on the magazine’s piece about O’Reilly’s claims regarding his work for CBS News covering the Falklands war, saying “A discerning reader of Deadline can easily see that Bill O’Reilly is hiding behind name-calling, rather than dealing with the substance of the matter,” and that Mother Jones sent O’Reilly a long list of detailed questions about his comments regarding his experience as a war reporter. ” He and Fox News declined to respond. Instead, O’Reilly hurls invective, seemingly to distract,” Corn told Deadline.

“It’s a total hit piece,” Bill O’Reilly told Deadline about the report Corn wrote in Mother Jones about O’Reilly’s claims in re his coverage of Falklands war. In the post, Corn said some of O’Reilly’s stories “don’t withstand scrutiny — even claiming he acted heroically in a war zone that he apparently never set foot in.”

O’Reilly blasted the piece to other news outlets as well, and is continuing to do so today — during which he has been quoted by at least one outlet, TV Newser, as saying he expected those reporters with whom he spoke to “verify what I’m saying, because it’s easily verifiable, then I expect David Corn to be in the kill zone.”

Wow! And the scariest part is that O’Reilly’s supporters and Fox News disciples will be angry enough not only to agree, but will find ways to carry it out. So yes, I too would be worried for David Corn.

The bottom line is that those who worship the insidiousness and caveman-like mentalities of modern-day conservatism who believe in personal responsibility need to practice what they preach and take accountability for one of their own who’s going off the deep end with lies and anger management problems and not blame everyone else for their fuck ups. Rather, O’Reilly needs to man up and own his mistakes. His reputation has always been shady, but now there is proof. It is not a liberal plot to undermine the “purity” of America and go after a proud American. This is what real journalism is about, going after corruption. And Bill O’Reilly, through the years has proven just how corrupt he is.


  1.  SnowMan said:

    March 1, 2015 at 11:00 pm

    Just another moronic post, Brotha Wolf. There is no O’Reilly scandal.

    What O’Reilly said has already been corroborated, so your whining is just silly. I’m enjoying your desperation, though. [Edtior’s Note: Wow! Derisive start. I might even be forced to tell SnowMan to tone it down on my own blog. I don’t allow overly hostile exchanges on these pages.]

    You and I both know that the nitwit David Corn [Editor’s Note: And I typically don’t allow name-calling on my pages. However, Brotha Wolf does, so SnowMan is not out of line here in calling columnist David Corn a “nitwit.” It also happens to be true.] has nothing to fear from Bill O’Reilly, or from anyone else at FOX News. [Editor’s Note: This is true. And obvious. Brotha Wolf’s point that David Corn fears bodily harm from O’Reilly is just as stupid as a rock.] It’s funny to hear you left-wing dealers in fake hysteria fabricating the sillinesses that you know will get your sheep followers all in a lather. Go ahead, name the last time that someone in the media was physically harmed by someone on the right. Go ahead. I’ll wait, but I won’t hold my breath. [Editor’s Note: Good point. No one in America has anything to fear from the right.]

    Want more proof? O’Reilly is the biggest name in cable talk. If there were really something there, it would be all over the news, and especially on all the rivals of FOX. They all SALIVATE to bring O’Reilly down. [Editor’s Note: Yep. That’s for sure.]

    But there’s nothing. Anywhere

    Go ahead. Go to http://www.msnbc.com. Search “O’Reilly” on the site. You come up with something from back in august of 2013 — nearly two years ago. [Editor’s Note: Below, BW demands that SnowMan “back it up.” This is “backing it up.”]

    CNN has something, and it’s all the stuff that has already been shown to be false. See if you can guess which two cable networks would be the most eager to get rid of O’Reilly. Yup. MSNBC and CNN, and CNN has become the National Enquirer of cable.
    So, again, nothing anywhere.

    Either way, even if it were to be true, it would be the odd exception that proves the rule that America’s political right-wing is the least corrupt political group in America, while the left is by far the most corrupt. Why? [Editor’s Note: Yep. This is obvious.] Because this happens all the time on the left, going back to Dan Rather and his fraudulent reporting on George W. Bush, and before. [Editor’s Note: Another good point. ]

    The other proof is that the odd time that it happens on the right, you whining lot on the left jump all over it, because, FINALLY, you think, you have something. [Editor’s Note: Pow!]

    Last, and most convincing proof: if there were something there, it would have been broken by Drudge, and there’s nothing on Drudge.

    It happens a thousand times on the left, and all you lot say is, “nothing to see here.” It happens just once on the right and somehow it’s proof that it’s everywhere on the right.

    You called O’Reilly corrupt. Prove it. Examples. Otherwise, you’re just a cowardly liar. [Editor’s Note: Double Pow!]

    This SnowMan guy just took apart Brotha Wolf’s post!

  2. Snowman,

    There are articles to have shown that O’Reilly has lied numerous times. And O’Reilly has shown that he can’t take the news. [Editor’s Note: Brotha Wolf just says things. No indication that he has any real basis for saying them, but he says them anyway. This is an important modus operandi or the left. Why? Well, one reason is that any moron can just say things, and the left is full of just any morons.]

    In any case, this has shown how far downhill journalism and news has gotten. Whether it’s Bill O’Reilly or Brian Williams, it proves that there must be some kind of reform where people can trust the news again. Period. That in itself is not a liberal or conservative matter. [Editor’s Note: He’s wrong here, of course. Media corruption is very much a left-wing problem.] But conservatives are at the forefront in trying to destroy truth. [Editor’s Note: Another thing that BW just says. No proof.] That is something that can not be overlooked. Period. You can get upset and angry all you want, but the truth is that O’Reilly and Fox News represent the worst news has to offer. [Editor’s Note: And, of course, O’Reilly has nothing to do with news. He’s a commentator.]

  3. Exactly, ‘Wolf-the lack of journalistic integrity and actual, Qualified reporters with a true sense of dignity and above all Honesty are neither a “Left” nor “Right” issue, but rather a pressing matter that every citizen should be concerned about (for those who give a rat’s azz about Real news, that is)!!!  [Editor’s Note: And, of course, O’Reilly has nothing to do with news. He’s a commentator. Mz. Nikita’s none too bright either.]

  4.  SnowMan said:

    March 2, 2015 at 5:40 am

    Two things: (1) Point me to one such article, and please make it a credible one. The ones at CNN were nothing… already debunked. And obviously nothing from Corn would do. Something credible.

    (2) You said that “conservatives are at the forefront in trying to destroy truth.” That’s a bunch of hogwash. Again, offer credible evidence, or you’re either proving that you’re completely ignorant or lying. [Editor’s Note: I love it! SnowMan calls him out. Down below, you’ll see that Brotha Wolf doesn’t, can’t rise to the challenge. ]

    Credible evidence is not “Everyone knows,” or “This non-credible publication said.” Credible is facts from credible sources. At this point, you’re just saying things.

    Left-wing media is OFTEN caught just making things up. Remember Dan Rather? The right-wing media, or FOX News has never been credibly accused of making things up.

    So again prove it. [Editor’s Note: So, SnowMan provides a real example that everyone knows as fact.]

    • I have a feeling any kind of source I cite will be immediately dismissed by you as being “leftist” and therefore untrue by default in your view. I can’t prove something to someone who automatically dismisses opposing opinions based on facts. So, why bother? By th way, I know you’re type. So, don’t think I’m naive enough to fall for your trap of me going out of my way to cite sources you will discount anyway because they’re simply not conservative. Nice try. [Editor’s Note: Just a weak evasion. Not unexpected, though.]

      1. Why oh why, do these white racists presume that all black people posting here are ‘liberal’? Oh, I know why, if they had two brains they would be twice as stupid. Ideologues of the world unite! [Editor’s Note: Here’s the brainless Herneith. Needless to say the very first thing out of her is “Racist!” What a moron. SnowMan shreds her below, in one of the more enjoyable posts I’ve ever read.]

      2.  SnowMan said:

        March 3, 2015 at 1:12 pm

        Again, failing to name such “facts” proves that you’re engaging in nothing but AT BEST conjecture.

        I’ll make it easier for you. A fact is something that we all agree is a fact. That DOES rule out everything from the ideological media. Example: when Dan Rather smeared George W. Bush, eventually it came out that he HAD smeared George W. Bush. It’s an accepted fact now. The document he used was forged, and there were ways to determine that and they were made public. You say there are “articles to have shown that O’Reilly has lied numerous times.” Okay point to one. Not an opinion piece like the bilge you posted above, but an actual article containing actual facts.  [Editor’s Note: Oof! SnowMan seems to take no prisoners. Kind of refreshing, actually.]

      3. A fact is something that is objectively proven to be true. Why don’t you show me proof of your claims and we’ll see if they are objective or biased in favor of you? Since you’re so hung up on proof, why not make the first move? Provide links or something, instead of ranting. [Editor’s Note: More weak evasion. I’m under no burden of proof, even though I offered an example above, in support of my point.]

      4. And if you want articles to see, go to my twitter page and take your pick. In case you missed it, it’s on the left side of the blog.

        Also, don’t assume that I’m “leftist” simply because I disagree with all that modern-day conservatism is about. I also have a problem with modern-day liberalism. So, don’t assume that just because I disagree with one, I agree with the other.

      5.  SnowMan said:

        March 3, 2015 at 1:20 pm

        Herneith, you’re either a blithering idiot, or you just play one on blogs. You have no idea what color I am or even what country I’m from. If YOU had two brains, that would be three more than you have now. Better put something over your ears, or that howling vacuum between them will suck in even more debris.

        You DO have one point though. You might not be a liberal. You’re just not bright enough to realize you’re one of their stooges..

        Morons of the world unite! [Editor’s Note: Wow! Herneith is taken down! Having faced Herneith’s brainless accusations, this was just a whole lotta fun to read! I’m guessing that Herneith will bow out here.]

      6. Hold up! So you assume that just because she’s not a conservative that means she plays for the other side? You know what they say about those who assume. They make asses out of themselves. And yet, you seem to be proud of being one. More power to ya. [Editor’s Note: Brotha Wolf’s just been mailing it in here.]

  SnowMan said:

March 4, 2015 at 1:00 am
You flunked, Brotha Wolf. You made the accusations, you have to provide the proof.
If you look at the top, you’ll see that it’s YOUR name on the topmost post. Not mine. Your evasion shows you have only baseless accusations. Anyone can just repeat things … like sheep. That’s disgusting behavior, even for a racist like you.

About Herneith. And about you. Whether both of you like it or not the DEBATE takes place on the left-right axis. You spend all your time attacking the right. You’re not attacking the right from the further right. Furthermore, you say nothing against the left. Your pretense that you’re part of some “third way” is transparently false. A lie? Simple ignorance? Who knows? Who can read another’s heart?

I peruse your blog quite a bit just to find out what the blind followers are saying, and Herneith is a regular poster (not a contributor). She’s the same way: one who has the vanity to think she’s some brave, independent thinker, when she’s nothing more than a tiresome, preening, leftist dupe.

As regards my challenge, the burden of proof is yours, since you made the accusations. I’m telling you that you have no ACTUAL proof. The fact that you offer none proves my point.

I win.


We’ll see whether this fun exchange continues! Courage is not a characteristic of BW’s. I suspect he’ll bail soon enough pretending he’s just too smart, too insightful … too good for SnowMan, when, really, BW’s just … overmatched. I sure wish I could jump in and help out, even though it’s a bit like shooting fish in a barrel.

— xPraetorius


(1) – A colleague of mine, for example, a petite, brilliant black woman, engaged Brotha Wolf and was able to conceal both her sex and her color from the braying herds at Brotha Wolf’s site for most of the very long exchange before she, too, was banned. I can’t conclude definitively that “SnowMan” is a he, but for the nonce I’ll assume he’s a he.

2 thoughts on “Hilarious Exchange with the RGI

Please Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: