Socialism Is Evil (Part III)


The human condition is an innate, ceaseless drive to… improve itself. Every second of every day, with every breath, and every act, no matter how tiny, no matter how seemingly trivial. Socialism, though, proposes to handcuff, straitjacket, confine the human condition. To imprison the human being.

 

Socialists call that “justice.”

 

Bottom Line: Socialism is the urge to reject real human progress and return to the primitive. 

 

Continue reading Socialism Is Evil (Part III)

Socialism Is Evil (Part II)

Socialism Is Evil (Part II)


The human condition is an innate, ceaseless drive to… improve itself. Every second of every day, with every breath, and every act, no matter how tiny, no matter how seemingly trivial. Socialism, though, proposes to handcuff, straitjacket, confine the human condition. To imprison the human being.

 

Socialists call that “justice.”

 

Bottom Line: Socialism is the urge to reject real human progress and return to the primitive. 

 

Continue reading Socialism Is Evil (Part II)

Socialism Is Evil

Socialism Is Evil


The human condition is an innate, ceaseless drive to… improve itself. Every second of every day, with every breath, and every act, no matter how tiny, no matter how seemingly trivial. Socialism, though, proposes to handcuff, straitjacket, confine the human condition. To imprison the human being.

 

Socialists call that “justice.”

 

Bottom Line: Socialism is the urge to reject real human progress and return to the primitive. 

 

Continue reading Socialism Is Evil

How We Debate Here

How We Debate Here


We had come to realize that there are quite a lot of unserious people out there. People who were not coming here to debate in good faith, but instead wanted to insult, to whine, to pettifog, to filibuster, and filibluster, and largely waste everyone’s time. That wouldn’t, and won’t do.

 

Our blog is heavily consumed in the IDW (Intellectual Dark Web), and most heavily in the Academia sub-group of the IDW. Deep cover Conservative and Libertarian academics and faculty members use our materials extensively, reproducing them samizdat-style, so as to keep our blog well under the radar.

 

We can’t force those courageous intellectuals to weed through a bunch of substanceless muck to generate the content they need for their educational efforts! 

 

Continue reading How We Debate Here

Small Minds in Big Jobs

Small Minds in Big Jobs


This is, America, the land where you’re supposed to find doctors who’ll provide you with good medical care, where honest, upright judges will provide actual justice — because they’re under no political pressures to skew their findings; where honest, patriotic politicians will make laws that are themselves just; where the judges will follow those just laws; where there are intrepid, brilliant scientists who are able to pursue their trade, free of political pressures to taint their observations; where scientists, who ostensibly became scientists to search for truth, would recoil violently from the temptation to conform to political pressures. Why? Because thus to taint their research would poison the very ground on which they walk, and when found out, would make every scientist’s work product suspect.

 

Continue reading Small Minds in Big Jobs

Ah, The Science! (Part II)

Ah, The Science! (Part II)


One thing is certain, you can never, ever, not ever, not even once, trust any discipline, organization, or thinking that works actively to squelch, purge, drown out, shout down, deplatform, anathematize or ostracize the holders of dissenting viewpoints or awkward questions.

 

Organizations that engage in such behaviors are openly confessing either the weakness of their own position, or the fraudulence of their reasoning for holding the position.

 

Or both.

 

Continue reading Ah, The Science! (Part II)

An Instructive Conversation on Facebook

An Instructive Conversation on Facebook


Name-calling is juvenile, and hardens the target against your arguments. Fabrications are easy to knock aside — like the silly New York Times article. And the irrational — like pretending that you know anyone else’s experience, and how it affected him or her — makes it valid to suggest that the rest of your arguments are just as unserious.

 

Avoid the hasty conclusion that suggests that you think there’s only your way or the idiot’s way.

 

Others who believe differently are NOT, by definition, idiots. Others who think differently are NOT, by definition, bigots or racists. Others who perceive things differently are NOT, by definition, fascists or Nazis.

 

Continue reading An Instructive Conversation on Facebook

Facebook = The Russians

Facebook = The Russians


I’m still not sure how I come down on this in terms of regulating Facebook, or not, but let’s not kid ourselves: Facebook, and the other socialist media are giving the equivalent of untold billions of dollars in free money and services to Democrats across the nation in the upcoming election.

 

This is just the logical extension of the Obama Administration’s aggressive silencing of Conservative political voices into the private sector.

 

Continue reading Facebook = The Russians

The Lie Lives on The Left

The Lie Lives on The Left


Those who simply let the lie continue, give the lie respectability, tolerate the lie as an “alternate viewpoint,” are complicit in the triumph of the lie.

 

But, I hear you say, “Can’t they say the same about you and your beliefs?” Yep. They sure can. Because we’re not shutting down anyone’s speech, or anyone’s ability to criticize us and question the validity of our ideas.

 

You can tell what, precisely, is the lie, by determining which holders of which beliefs are doing all they can to shut up, shut down, or shut out dissenting opinions.

 

Continue reading The Lie Lives on The Left

Ah, The <b><i>Science!</i></b>

Ah, The Science!


“Unfortunately, researchers’ dramatic conclusions too often go unexamined. Fearful conclusions make us abandon our critical thinking and valid contrasting research gets ignored. Too often research gets designed to fit prevailing fears so that science now suffers from a “replicability crisis”. Ten years ago, Stanford epidemiologist tested over 400 research published claims and only one could be replicated and validated. The editor of Europe’s top medical journal, the Lancet, speculated half of their published research was likely false. Outside the laboratory, claims about ecology and climate are far more difficult to verify.”

 

Well! What happened to… The Science?!?

 

Continue reading Ah, The Science!

Is The Unraveling of the LEFT Accelerating?

Is The Unraveling of the LEFT Accelerating?


The left’s “canon” is a hodge-podge of contradictory, stupid, supercilious conclusions unsupported by facts or evidence, because they’re really based on what leftists believe will bring them power.

 

To obtain and retain power is, of course, the only reason for the Left’s stance on environmentalism. 

 

Well, here’s a prominent environmentalist — Michael Schellenberger — admitting that what we’ve been saying has been true all along!

 

Continue reading Is The Unraveling of the LEFT Accelerating?

Now I Understand…

Now I Understand…


The saying goes: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Rings true.

 

As Hitler was rising in power in Germany, there were good men warning about it. The most famous of whom was, of course, Winston Churchill. But there were also good men in Germany warning about it all. It’s just that there weren’t enough. And/or, no one gave the alarmists the time of day. And/or many actively shut them up. And/or many said things like, we must tolerate all viewpoints, even those we find disagreeable.

 

Continue reading Now I Understand…

What The #*!$@^!  <b><i>Heck?!?!?</i></b>

What The #*!$@^! Heck?!?!?


The truly important thing to know is: has the rate of infection changed among the now well-known vulnerable populations: the elderly and the infirm? If those numbers are staying about the same, or diminishing, then the rising number of “new cases” is not even the tiniest bit worrisome. Guess what: the important stuff about COVID is all going in the right direction: down. Things like: Death rates, hospitalization rates, infection rates among vulnerable populations…

 

Continue reading What The #*!$@^! Heck?!?!?

Platform Or Publisher?

Platform Or Publisher?


• Regardless of whether the social media outlets are platforms or publishers, they have vast power.

 

Censorship is how the Left does it. They deprive the right of the ability to communicate with the American people.

 

• The ones who censor dissenting opinions are admitting both:

     — their insecurity in the strength of their own beliefs, and

     — that they themselves suspect that their beliefs will not survive in a fair fight. 

 

Continue reading Platform Or Publisher?

Red, Black and Blue — The Intersectional Civil War

Red, Black and Blue — The Intersectional Civil War


What do you think the black leftists, the hispanic leftists, the feminists, the pro-deathers, the pro-kill granny bunch, even the gays! — all the rest of the vast American Grievance Industry —  were doing during the time that 330 million people were bending over backward for a few hundred thousand very confused people?

 

Answer: They were seething.

 

Continue reading Red, Black and Blue — The Intersectional Civil War

Donald Trump: the <i>First Black President</i>

Donald Trump: the First Black President


Some called Barack Obama the First Black President, but that didn’t pass even the most superficial scrutiny. Any First Black President would, obviously, encounter nothing but sneering, aggressive hostility from the press, dominated as the press is, by lily-white, pasty-faced men. That’s what Toni Morrison — the coiner of the expression itself — told us. Morrison told us that widespread press abuse was the reason… Bill Clinton deserved the title!

 

But… Barack Obama received only fawning, white-glove, adoring, loving, tender coverage from all the dominant media of the day. For eight looooong, cringe-inducing, eye-rolling, stomach-turning years.

 

Barack Obama, plainly, was not the First Black President.

 

Continue reading Donald Trump: the First Black President

What’s <b><i>Actually</i></b> Wrong With The Phrase “<i>Black Lives Matter?</i>” (Part III)

What’s Actually Wrong With The Phrase “Black Lives Matter?” (Part III)


If the Black Lives Matter movement were actually honest in their contention that black lives matter, then they’d march into the offices of countless mayors — all Democrats — of countless big cities across the country, and demand that they stop turning the cities into slaughterhouses for black people. And, if they don’t, well then they’ll have to go.

 

Why don’t they do that? Because, black lives don’t really matter to the Black Lives Matter movement. Only power matters to them.

 

Continue reading What’s Actually Wrong With The Phrase “Black Lives Matter?” (Part III)

The Popularity of Today’s American Left Depends Entirely on Lies.

The Popularity of Today’s American Left Depends Entirely on Lies.


for example: No  demographic group in the history of the world enjoys more benevolent feeling, more sincere, earnest good will than black Americans. Yet, the American Left insists that every white person in the country wastes vast quantities of his or her personal time in trying to determine how to make and keep black Americans miserable.

 

The popularity of today’s American Left depends entirely on this and other lies.

 

Continue reading The Popularity of Today’s American Left Depends Entirely on Lies.

The Problem With The Left-Right “Debate”

The Problem With The Left-Right “Debate”


It’s a simple problem. The Left’s arguments, their “thinking,” their policy proposals, are so stupid, and have been so stupid for so long, that we’ve stopped  being incredulous at the stupidity of it all, and we started taking their codswallop seriously.

 

Leftists say counter-intuitive, stupid, moronic thing after counter-intuitive, stupid, moronic thing, so that after a while, we’ve stopped saying, “They can’t really believe this hogwash!” and we say, “Maybe I’m missing something.”

 

Continue reading The Problem With The Left-Right “Debate”

If It Had Been a Public Shooting, Instead of a White Cop Killing a Black Man…

If It Had Been a Public Shooting, Instead of a White Cop Killing a Black Man…


Does everyone at least recognize that if The Big Event had been a school shooting, then today’s hysteria, would be about the need to increase funding for the cops? That today’s oh-so pious virtue signaling would be all about the desperate need to increase police power and presence in schools and on the streets?

 

In other words, if The Big Event had been some kind of mass public shooting, today’s manic hysteria would be all about the exact opposite of what it’s all about today. This country would be the same country either way, but your indoctrination by the media in how you should think of the country would be 180° the opposite of what you’re getting today. Instead of race, race, race, and more race, it’d be guns, guns, guns and more guns. Same grave faces, same furious virtue signaling.

 

Continue reading If It Had Been a Public Shooting, Instead of a White Cop Killing a Black Man…

Finally!

Finally!


President Trump is, of course, cooperating mightily with the effort to make him the villain of the piece — his low character, tough-guy strutting, and habitual Twitter buffoonery all go a long way toward that. The Democrats are lucky to have him as a foil. Otherwise, they might be made to really seriously answer some uncomfortable questions, such as: Who has been in charge in Minneapolis lo these many years? Philadelphia? Chicago? Detroit? Los Angeles? Cleveland? Dallas? To the extent that governance matters, how is it that the situations in these communities is to be understood as anything other than the result of practically exclusive Democratic political power? And if Democratic political power is insufficient to turn things around in these places, then why is the answer to the current crisis more Democratic political power?

 

Continue reading Finally!

What Would A GOOD Political Left-Wing Look Like? (Update…)

What Would A GOOD Political Left-Wing Look Like? (Update…)


“If you’re going to pursue things of value in a social environment, you’re going to produce a hierarchy. It’s unavoidable, because some people are better at whatever it is that you value, and so when that lays itself out socially it will produce a hierarchy.

 

The hierarchy has a necessity, if you’re going to pursue the things of value. But it has a risk. The risk is that it will ossify and become corrupt. That’s risk number one. And risk number two is that when you produce the hierarchy, you’re going to dispossess a number of people, because there’ll be lots of people in the hierarchy who aren’t good at it, and they’ll be dispossessed. So you need a political voice for them. That’s the Left.”

 

Continue reading What Would A GOOD Political Left-Wing Look Like? (Update…)